Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

  1. The GNSO Council adopts the GNSO Review of the Copenhagen GAC Communiqué (see )and requests that the GNSO Council Chair communicate the GNSO Review of the Copenhagen GAC Communiqué to the ICANN Board.
  2. The GNSO Council requests that the GNSO Council Chair also informs the GAC Chair of the communication between the GNSO Council and the ICANN Board. 

 

 

Motion - Initiation of Policy Amendment Process on Specific Red Cross Names

...

7. The Council thanks all of those who participated in the talks at ICANN58 in Copenhagen, and in particular Bruce Tonkin for moderating the discussion.

 

MOTION - Adoption of the GNSO Council Comment on FY18 Budget and Operating Plan

...

2. The GNSO Council thanks the volunteers who prepared the comments and ICANN staff who provided invaluable assistance to the volunteers in the drafting of the comments.

 

Motion - Nomination of GNSO Candidates for the Registration Directory Service (formerly WHOIS) Review Team

Submitted by: Johan Helsingius (revised version sent in on 19th April 2017)

Seconded: 


Whereas,

 

  1. On 22 February 2017, ICANN launched a call for volunteers seeking individuals interested in serving as a Volunteer Review Team Member on the RDS-RT (see https://www.icann.org/news/announcement-2-2017-02-22-en).
  2. Under the new Bylaws, each SO/AC participating in the Specific Review may nominate up to 7 members to the review team, for consideration by the SO/AC leadership, for a review team of no more than 21 members. Any SO/AC nominating up to 3 individuals are entitled to have those nominees selected as members to the review team, so long as the nominees meet the applicable criteria for service on the team.
  3. The GNSO Council tasked the GNSO Standing Selection Committee (SSC) ‘to carry out the review and selection of GNSO endorsed candidates for the Registration Directory Service Review Team for Council consideration at the latest by its 20 April 2017 meeting’.
  4. The SSC reviewed the candidates that requested GNSO endorsement (see https://community.icann.org/x/gYfDAw) taking into account the criteria outlined in the call for volunteers as well as the desire to ensure a RT that is balanced for diversity and expertise. The SSC submitted its full consensus recommendations to the GNSO Council on 19 April 2017 which confirmed the ranking of the 1-7 candidates as well as the expectation that, at a minimum, the 1-4 candidates would be considered primary candidates with a guaranteed seat for the RDS-RT, instead of only 1-3, recognizing the importance and relevance of the topics under consideration for the GNSO community as well as noting that a number of SO/ACs will not be making nominations for this specific review team .
  5. The GNSO Council considered the recommendations of the SSC.

...