Versions Compared

Old Version 1

changes.mady.by.user de saint gery

Saved on

compared with

New Version 2

changes.mady.by.user de saint gery

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

Motion for Approval of a the Data & Metrics Working Group Recommendations (non-PDP)

 

WHEREAS

 

On 17 October 2012 the GNSO Council requested an Issue Report on metrics and reporting (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/issues/uofr-final-31mar13-en.pdf).

On 16 May 2013 the GNSO Council deliberated a recommendation on the Uniformity of Reporting from the Registration Abuse Policies Working Group (RAPWG) and approved a non-PDP Working Group to consider metrics and reporting:

“The GNSO Council further approves the creation of a drafting team to develop a charter for a non-PDP Working Group to consider additional methods for collecting necessary metrics and reporting from Contracted Parties and other external resources to aid the investigation.” (http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20130516-1). 

 

On 23 Jan 2014 the GNSO Council approved the charter for a Data and Metrics for Policy Making Working Group (DMPM WG) (see http://gnso.icann.org/en/council/resolutions#20140123-1).

 

The Data and Metrics for Policy Making WG (DMPM WG) deliberated the issues as defined in its charter and published an Initial Report for public comment on 29 July 2015 for the required 40 day period (see https://www.icann.org/public-comments/data-metrics-policy-making-2015-07-29-en). 

 

The DMPM WG reviewed the input received (see public comment review tool) and updated its report accordingly.

 

On 9 October 2015 the DMPM WG submitted its Final Report to the GNSO Council. [LINK TO DOCUMENT]

 

RESOLVED,

 

The GNSO Council adopts all the consensus recommendations in the Final Report and instructs ICANN staff to begin implementation of the seven recommendations.

 

The GNSO Council thanks the DMPM WG for its efforts and recommends that the WG be formally closed as a result of the adoption by the GNSO Council of the WG’s recommendations.

 

The WG nevertheless requests that the WG remain available to provide input to the GNSO Council and ICANN staff should any questions or issues arise in relation to implementation of its recommendations prior to the formation of an Implementation Review Team.

 

The GNSO Council requests ICANN staff to prepare an evaluation report for the GNSO Council shortly after the conclusion of implementation of this pilot effort.