Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

View file
nameRespuesta a la moción de censura 17092015-1.pdf
height250
View file
nameAnswer English.pdf
height250
View file
nameRespuesta portugues.pdf
height250

 

SUMMARY OF THE DOCUMENTS POSTED ABOVE:

 

Based on Article 11 of LACRALO RoPs, we propose the following resolution:


"LACRALO lacks competence to rule on the motion of no confidence presented by Mr. Carlton Samuels because there are no rules regulating this situation, and so the motion cannot be handled."

 

VOTE  in a subsidiary manner to the proposed resolution above, an amendment to the operative part of Mr. Samuels' motion. This amendment consists in adding the following phrase to the operative part of the motion of no confidence:

AMENDMENT

 

See proposed Amendment below : 

"Resolved:

 The General Assembly shall demonstrate its lack of confidence in LACRALO leadership and shall vote on this motion. This motion shall be considered approved by the vote of a two-thirds majority of the ALSes' representatives present and voting."

...

The  discussion will be opened until 8 October 2015, 23:00.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

...

The voting process shall be governed by rules 12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP. Concerning the proposed resolution, the following question will be asked:

QUESTION:

Do you believe that LACRALO is competent to vote a motion of no confidence?

            1. Yes, the motion of no confidence must move forward.

            2. No, the motion of no confidence must be ignored.

 

a.- If the NO wins, the proposed resolution shall be considered approved. As a consequence, the proposed amendment and Mr. Samuels' motion of no confidence must be ignored.

...

Do you agree with the following amendment to the operative part of Mr. Samuels' motion?

"Resolved:

The General Assembly shall demonstrate its lack of confidence in LACRALO leadership and shall vote on this motion. This motion shall be considered approved by the vote of a two-thirds majority of the ALSes' representatives present and voting."

1.- YES

2.- NO

 

c. - If the YES wins, the amendment shall be considered approved. In this case, a voting period on the amended motion of no confidence will be opened. In this case, there will be no need to rule on Mr. Samuels' motion.

...

The voting process shall be governed by rules 12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP.

Do you agree to approve, by the vote of a two-thirds majority of the ALSes' representatives present and voting, the motion of no confidence in LACRALO leadership?

1.- YES

2.- NO

 

d.- If the NO wins, the amendment shall be considered rejected. In this case, a voting period on Mr. Samuels' motion of no confidence will be opened.

...

The voting process shall be governed by rules 12, 19 and 20 of LACRALO's RoP.

Do you agree to approve the motion of no confidence in LACRALO leadership?

1.- YES

2.- NO