Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.
Note
titleRecommendation 10

That a professional facilitator/moderator is used in certain situations (for example, when policy issues are complex, where members of the WG are generally inexperienced and/or where WG members have interests that conflict), and that the GNSO develop guidelines for the circumstances in which professional facilitators/moderators are used for Working Groups.

Working Party (initial assessment of feasibility and usefulness):  CG - Accept as is.
Staff (initial assessment of feasibility and usefulness):
  •  Accept As-Is
  •  Accept With modification
  •  Reject

Rationale:

MK: Accept with modification. It should probably be made clear that this is a determination that the GNSO Council is expected to make (whether or not a professional facilitator/moderator is used). Note also potential budget implications. It is also worth mentioning that there is currently a pilot program ongoing that assesses the effectiveness of the use of a professional facilitator / moderator. The results of this pilot should also be factored into this recommendation.

Basis for Assessment: 
Work in Progress:GNSO F2F Facilitated PDP WG meeting  pilot project FY15, FY16
Expected Completion Date for Work in Progress:Pilot continued for FY16
Milestones:Evaluated annually
Responsibility:GNSO Council/Staff

 

 

Recently Updated
typespage, comment
max5
themesocial