Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Item 3: Consent agenda (0 mins)


Item 4: COUNCIL VOTE Motion to extend term of GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee

In September 2015 the GNSO Council passed a resolution to appoint Mason Cole as the GNSO Liaison to the Governmental Advisory Committee (GAC) as part of a one-year pilot project. The position was created as part of the recommendations of the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group to  facilitate early engagement of the GAC in GNSO policy development processes. As the GAC-GNSO Consultation Group has determined that more time is needed to fully evaulate this pilot project, an extension was requested and granted for FY16. The GNSO Council will vote on having Mason Cole continue in the role of GNSO liaison to the GAC for FY16. 

4.1 – Presentation of the motion (Volker Greimann)

4.2 – Discussion

4.3 – Council vote

 

Item 5: COUNCIL VOTE – Adoption of Final Report and Recommendations from the Policy & Implementation Working Group (10 mins)

...

The GNSO Council chartered Working Group in July 2013 to develop recommendations on, among other matters, principles to underpin GNSO policy- and implementation-related discussions; processes and criteria for developing gTLD policy guidance (for creating policy other than “Consensus Policy”); and guidance on the operation and functions of GNSO Implementation Review Teams. The WG submitted its Final Report to the GNSO Council on 2 June 2015. Here the Council will vote on whether to adopt the WG’s Final Report and the recommendations contained therein.

 

45.1 – Presentation of the motion (Amr Elsadr)

45.2 – Discussion

45.3 – Council vote

 

 

Item 56: COUNCIL VOTE – Adoption of Final Report and Recommendations from the Translation & Transliteration of gTLD Contact Information PDP Working Group (10 mins)

...

The GNSO Council initiated this PDP in June 2013, and the WG was chartered in November 2013 to develop policy recommendations on whether or not it would be desirable to translate or transliterate gTLD contact information into a single common language or script (as applicable), and if so who should bear the cost burden of doing so. The PDP WG submitted its Final Report to the GNSO Council on 12 June 2015. Here the Council will vote on whether to adopt the WG’s Final Report and the recommendations contained therein.

 

56.1 – Presentation of the motion (Amr Elsadr)

56.2 – Discussion

56.3 – Council vote

 

 

Item 67: COUNCIL VOTE – Issue Report Preceding a Potential Policy Development Process on New gTLDs in Subsequent Rounds (15 mins)

...

The GNSO Council created a New gTLDs Subsequent Rounds Discussion Group in June 2014 to discuss experiences gained during the current expansion round of new gTLDs, and identify possible subjects for future policy work that might result in changes to application procedures. The Discussion Group co-chairs notified the Council at the Council’s May meeting that the Group has completed its Issues/Recommendations Matrix and would be recommending that the Council request an Issue Report – a mandatory step preceding a possible Policy Development Process (PDP) – to further scope out the topics that have been identified by the Discussion Group as potential issues for a PDP.

 

67.1 – Presentation of the motion (Bret Fausett)

67.2 – Discussion

67.3 – Council vote

 


Item 78: COUNCIL VOTE – Proposal from the Cross Community Working Group regarding the transition of IANA stewardship on naming related functions (20 mins)

...

As a chartering organization of the CWG-Stewardship the GNSO will need to approve the group’s final proposal. Here the Council will review the GNSO community’s deliberations on the issue, and vote on whether or not to adopt the final proposal, which is conditional on the completion and adoption of the work on Work Stream I from the CCWG-Accountability (see further below).

78.1 – Presentation of the motion (Jonathan Robinson)
78.2 – Discussion
78.3 – Council vote

 

Item 89: DISCUSSION FOR POTENTIAL ACTION - Cross Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability – CCWG Accountability (20 mins)

...

The CCWG-Accountability developed two work streams, of which Work Stream 1 is intended to align with the timing of the CWG-Transition work and the overall NTIA objectives and timeline. Initial proposals for Work Stream 1 were published for public comment on 4 May 2015, with comments closing on 3 June. The CCWG-Accountability is reviewing all public comments received, and will conduct a face-to-face meeting on 17 & 18 July. Here the Council will review the CCWG’s work to date and to discuss what, if any, issues will need to be addressed by the GNSO or Council at this critical stage.

 

89.1 – Summary and status update (Thomas Rickert)

89.2 - Discussion

89.3 - Next steps
 

Item 910: DISCUSSION – Community Concerns over ICANN’s Response to the IPC Request regarding the “dotsucks” Registry (10 mins)

...

Some GNSO community groups have raised with the Council their concerns over ICANN’s handling of the Intellectual Property Constituency’s (IPC) letter of 27 March 2015 requesting that ICANN take action to halt the rollout of the “dotsucks” gTLD. Here the Council will hear from affected community members and discuss what, if any, action the Council can take to follow up on those concerns.

 

910.1 – Summary of the topic (Susan Kawaguchi)

910.2 – Discussion

910.3 – Next steps

 

 

Item 1011: COUNCIL ACTION – GNSO Drafting Team on New ICANN Meeting Strategy (10 mins)

Following initial Council discussions on planning GNSO-related meetings at ICANN Public Meetings after implementation of the new ICANN meeting strategy, a Drafting Team comprising several Council members was created to develop an initial proposal for GNSO community discussion. The proposal has since been circulated to other SO/ACs for their consideration and feedback, in the hope that it would assist these groups with planning, especially in relation to their interactions with the GNSO and for Meeting “B”. Here the Council will consider any feedback received from the community, and decide on next steps with implementing the GNSO planning proposal.

 

1011.1 – Update (Volker Greimann / Marika Konings)

1011.2 – Discussion

1011.3 – Next steps

 

 

Item 1112: Any Other Business (5 mins)

 
Item 1213: Open microphone (5 mins)

...