Versions Compared

Old Version 2

changes.mady.by.user Charla K. Shambley

Saved on

compared with

New Version 3

changes.mady.by.user Charla K. Shambley

Saved on

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Comment #Working Text ReferenceWorking Text Page #Comment Provided ByComment - Working Party Members Provide Feedback Here
1Section 3, Context for this Review6Philip Sheppard

It is suggested that this key ICANN board resolution is included:

In its resolution of 28 September 2013 the ICANN Board stated: “The expansion of the TLD space has increased the number and variety of stakeholders participating in GNSO policy making and a review needs to take place on schedule to examine whether the current model meets the needs of a new generation of stakeholders.

GNSO Structure is unlikely to accommodate the anticipated new stream of stakeholders resulting from the expansion of the TLD space. The GNSO Review will be an important vehicle for considering and addressing this issue. The unbalance that is already occurring needs to be addressed by the GNSO Review. ”

2   GeneralGeneralStephanie PerrinThank you for the opportunity to comment on the draft Westlake report.  There is much good work in here, but I believe a lot of work remains to be done prior to releasing a draft report for comments.  I would respectfully submit that the GNSO Review working party needs to see the next iteration of this report prior to its release for public comment, because there are a number of issues that need to be rectified. 
3    
4    
5