Page History
Cross-Community Working Group on Enhancing ICANN Accountability Draft 5.1, 28-Dec-2014, 11-Jan-2015
Work Area 2: Review Input from Public Comment and Categorize into Work Streams 1 & 2
...
2. Mechanisms to restrict actions of the board and management of the ICANN corporation. Most of these are initially designated as WS2, since the Members could reverse board or management decisions if Members are empowered in WS1 (above). | |||
Accountability Suggestions from public comments and posts | Supported by | WS | ATRT Ref. |
Require supermajority for Board to approve action despite advice to the contrary from ACs or significant subsets of SOs. Izumi believes this will take time, so should be in WS2 | ISPCP, ITIC, Izumi | WS1 | - |
Ensure that the ICANN Board can be held to its Bylaws, with effective remedy if breach found by independent adjudicator [Alt: found by the community]. | Malcolm Hutty, Seun Ojedeji | WS1 | |
Prevent ICANN Board redefining mission/scope in Bylaws without community consensus | Malcolm Hutty | WS2WS1 | - |
Ensure ICANN Board does not act "ultra vires", and stays within assigned mission and scope. e.g., prevent scope creep in policies imposed via RAA. | Malcolm Hutty, BC, TPI | WS2WS1 | |
Prohibit ICANN from entering agreements that impose obligations unrelated to DNS management | Heritage | WS2 | - |
Require supermajority board vote and 2/3 community vote to change ICANN not-for-profit status or change ICANN’s state of incorporation | USCIB, Verizon, SIIA [opposition noted] | WS2 | - |
Before leaving California, ICANN must show benefits exceed costs | SIIA, USCIB | WS2 | - |
Broadly expand grounds on which ICANN decisions and operations can be challenged; lower threshold to succeed in a challenge | Spain, Heritage | WS2 | |
|
|
| |
3. Mechanisms to prescribe actions of the ICANN corporation. Most of these are initially designated as WS2, since the Members could reverse board or management decisions if Members are empowered in WS1 (above). For example, a bottom-up consensus process to change ICANN bylaws might be rejected by ICANN board, but the Members could then reverse that decision and force the change. | |||
Accountability Suggestions from public comments and posts | Supported by | WS | |
Require a defined notion of consensus for any GAC advice that would need to be given deference by the ICANN board. Izumi believes this will take time, so should be in WS2 | Heritage, Izumi, BC Stress Test #6 | WS1 | |
Let local courts hear complaints on free expression, security, and privacy | NCSG [opposition noted] | WS2 | - |
Establish an independent inspector general for ICANN | SIIA | WS2 | - |
Commit the ICANN organization to maintain freedom of expression | Heritage, NCSG | WS2 | - |
Require registry and registrar agreements be equitable and non-discriminatory | ITIC, Heritage | WS1 | - |
Require supermajority of board to [increase] change registry or registrar fees [Members could reverse] | Heritage | WS1 | - |
Create channels for inquiry/complaint/suggestions | Internet Society of China | WS2 | (ATRT2 9.3) |
Recall mechanism for any board member selected by an AC/SO | Avri Doria | WS2 | - |
Recall mechanism for SO Council and ALAC member selected by NomCom | Avri Doria | WS2 | - |
ICANN to engage with all governments as equal community stakeholders | Fiona Asonga | WS2 | - |
Allow GAC to select 2-4 voting ICANN board members | Spain [opposition noted] | WS2 | - |
Give Ombudsman ability to refer a matter to external body | NCSG [opposition noted] | WS2 | |
Change bylaws to establish term limits for ICANN senior officers | Heritage | WS2 | - |
Change bylaws to require that ICANN remain subject to US Law. Izumi notes this should be WS2 | Heritage [opposition noted] | WS1 | - |
Explore incorporation as international org under international law | NRO [opposition noted] | WS2 | - |
Limit ICANN executive function to implementation of policies | ITIC, Siva | WS1 | - |
...