Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

Apologies: Charles Mok
Staff: Matthias Langenegger

Revision and Adoption of Secretariat Improvements Plan

Wolf: I suggest that everybody review reviews the improvements plan and send their input prior to Cartagena.

...

Olivier: Do we have deadlines for the Secretariat Imp planImprovements?
Darlene: So far, we didn't have deadlines. There However, there is a status column at the end.

Review of Cartagena Regional Leadership Meeting Agenda

Wolf: I would like to add a revision of the Board selection process from a RALO perspective to the agenda in Cartagena.

Hong: I fully agree to with that. This is a very important issue. Each RALO has a different approach to this the petition process and the Board selection and a comparison would be quite interesting. 

...

Wolf: With regards to outreach, in EURALO we recently had discussions with possible new applicants from Eastern Europe .Tijani: Olivier and myself are involved in WT Cin EURALO.

Wolf: Tijani do you want to include a discussion on the other WT recommendations .in the agenda?

Tijani: No, I don't think it is necessary as there will be further discussions on the WT recommendations in Cartagena.

Tijani: I think 30 minutes is not enough to discuss the outreach recommendations.

Hong: Should we give some time to discuss RALO policy processes? I think this is an interesting topic. We could compare the different policy processesdevelopment mechanisms in the RALOs.

Wolf: I think this is an important issue and should be discussed by the RALO leaders. However, there is not much time available for discussions in Cartagena. Do you think there would be a possibility to have an additional, informal meeting during one of the evenings? This could be a possiblity to discuss this further.

...

Hong: I don't think we have sufficient time to discuss this specific policy issues during the Secretariat meeting in Cartagena. I would rather focus on how the RALOs are engaging their ALSes to provide policy input.

Wolf: Is there approval that this should be further looked at in Cartagena? Or should Should the discussions on this topic be initiated in Cartagena and further discussed in the coming following weeks? Is there approval that this item could be discussed informally during an evening session in Cartagena?

There were no objections.

AI: Wolf will work with the RALO leadership to organize an informal get-together in Cartagena to discuss, among other things, the RALO policy development processes.

Review Draft Starter Kit for New ALS Reps

Wolf: this is an issue that started a long time ago. This document should help new At-Large members to get involved in At-Large. This document It has different parts: the At-Large mailing lists, the wiki workspaces, At-Large and ICANN website overview and the At-Large Facebook page.

...

Wolf: I agree with Darlene.

Tijani: I suggest to add adding the glossary to this document.

...

AI: Staff will explain all accronyms used in the present Starter Kit document and add a link to the ICANN glossary in a prominent position in the ALS rep starter kit.

Olivier: letLet's have pointers to the most important diagrams explaining ICANN and At-Large

...

Dev: We should start thinking about a video and a slideshow as an addition to the text starter kit.

AI: Staff will add an agenda item to the Cartagena Secretariat meeting to start discussions on a video version of the starter kit.

...