Page History
The 2nd At-Large Summit (ATLAS II) Final Declaration | |||||||||||||||
No. | Recommendation | Recipient 1 | Recipient 2 | Recipient 3 | Thematic Group Source | Assignees | NotesAssignees | Notes | |||||||
17 | ICANN needs to be sensitive to the fact that social media are blocked in certain countries and, in conjunction with technical bodies, promote credible alternatives | ICANN GSE Staff; ICANN CIIO |
|
| |||||||||||
21 | Encourage public campaigns on using the Internet for education, information, creativity and empowerment. | ICANN Board | ICANN Staff (GSE); GSE Staff |
|
| TG3 | Outreach | ||||||||
22 | Members of the general public should be able to participate in ICANN on an issue-by-issue basis. Information on the ICANN website should, where practical, be in clear and non-technical language. | ICANN GSE Staff |
|
| |||||||||||
23 | The roles and jurisdiction of the Ombudsman should be expanded. The ICANN website should provide a clear and simple way for the public to make complaints. | ICANN Board | ; ICANN Staff | TG4 | Future Challenges
|
| Social Media
| ||||||||
24 | Both the areas of the Ombudsman and Contractual Compliance should report regularly on the complaints they received, resolved, pending resolution and actions taken to address issues raised by unresolved complaints. | ICANN Staff |
|
| |||||||||||
26 | Current policy management processes within ICANN are insufficient. ICANN must implement a workable Policy Management Process System, available for use across the SO/ACs, in order to: | ICANN Board | ICANN Staff (Policy)TG5 | Social Media | Chairs of these 3 WGs to discuss how to tackle this task | • enhance Knowledge Management, | Technology Task Force• improve the effectiveness of all ICANN volunteer communities, | Capacity Building | • improve cross-community policy-specific activity, | • enhance policy development metrics, • facilitate multilingual engagement, • create a taxonomy of policy categories, • provide policy development history as an aid for newcomers. | ICANN Policy Staff; ICANN Board |
|
| ||
29 | The ALAC should implement an automated system for tracking topics of interest currently being discussed among the various RALOs, and accessible by everyone. | ALAC |
|
| |||||||||||
31 | ICANN and the ALAC should investigate the use of simple tools and methods to facilitate participation in public comments, and the use of crowdsourcing. | ALAC; ICANN GSE Staff |
|
|