Page History

...

1.  Responses from SOs/ACs: Extended the deadline to the end of March.  Continue to review responses.Rudi will speak to Michele Neylon as a reminder (Chair, Registrar SG)

2.  Review Work Plan and consider next steps.  Staff will create a table/matrix to summarize responses.

3.  Review reports re: Verification & Validation: Look at the relevant section of the RAA; page 23 of EWG Nov Update Document; Margie Milam's blog entry.

4.  Consider Requesting F2F Meetings in London: Registrars, ALAC, others?

...

For Review: TBD

1. Summary of Current Status/Next Steps (Stock Taking) 17 April 2014
   
2. A Model for Exploring WHOIS Accuracy (by Margie Milam)
3. Interim Report from the Expert Working Group on Internationalized Registration Data 10 April 2014
4. Status update report from the EWG on gTLD Directory Services 11 November 2013
5. WHOIS Accuracy Program Specification part of the 2013 Registrar Accreditation Agreement

...

Proposed Questions:

1.  What is contact information (review and expand on the taxonomies)?
2. Why are we doing this?; is this particular feature necessary?
3. Who gets access to what?
4. Who are the stakeholders?; who is affected? and what do they want (linking back to What)?
5. How much would a particular feature cost and how to weigh the costs versus the benefits?
6. When would policy come into effect?
7. What should be mandatory?
8. What is the difference between verification and validation?

...