Page History
...
Comments or questions arising.
Item 3: Consent agenda
No items
Item 4: MOTION - To adopt the charter for the Policy & Implementation Working Group On ICANN Bylaw recommendation (15 mins)
The issue regarding the boundary between policy development and implementation work has been a discussion point for some time and it has been a central theme in the execution of the new gTLD programme. In addition, the Council has been asked to consider issues for policy guidance and may well need to look at the evolution of its own work and processes to accommodate this type of request in future.
ICANN Staff has previously published a paper intended to facilitate further community discussions on this topic. Further community discussion took place in Beijing and the Council agreed to form a drafting team to develop a charter for a Working Group to address the issues that have been raised in the context of the recent discussions on policy and implementation that affect the GNSO.
This motion seeks to conclude the work of the Drafting Team by adopting the proposed charter for the Policy & Implementation Working Group.
work undertaken to deal with the most recent Reconsideration Request (13-3) highlighted the point that there is no currently defined policy or process within ICANN that requires the Board of ICANN or the ICANN staff to consult with the GNSO Council if the Board or staff is acting in contravention to a statement made by the GNSO Council outside of the policy development process (PDP).
This motion recognises this point and seeks to recommend to the ICANN Board, a change to the bylaws of ICANN to mandate such consultation in future.
5.1 Reading of the motion (Jeff Neumann)
5.2 Discussion of motion.
54.1 Reading of the motion (Wolf-Ulrich Knoben)
4.2 Discussion of motion.
4.3 Vote (Threshold: simple majority in each house 50% 50% i.e. 4 4 CPH 7 NCPH)
Item 5: MOTION - On ICANN Bylaw recommendation To adopt the charter for the Policy & Implementation Working Group (15 mins)
The work undertaken to deal with the most recent Reconsideration Request (13-3) highlighted the point that there is no currently defined policy or process within ICANN that requires the Board of ICANN or the ICANN staff to consult with the GNSO Council if the Board or staff is acting in contravention to a statement made by the GNSO Council outside of the policy development process (PDP).
This motion recognises this point and seeks to recommend to the ICANN Board, a change to the bylaws of ICANN to mandate such consultation in future.
issue regarding the boundary between policy development and implementation work has been a discussion point for some time and it has been a central theme in the execution of the new gTLD programme. In addition, the Council has been asked to consider issues for policy guidance and may well need to look at the evolution of its own work and processes to accommodate this type of request in future.
ICANN Staff has previously published a paper intended to facilitate further community discussions on this topic. Further community discussion took place in Beijing and the Council agreed to form a drafting team to develop a charter for a Working Group to address the issues that have been raised in the context of the recent discussions on policy and implementation that affect the GNSO.
This motion seeks to conclude the work of the Drafting Team by adopting the proposed charter for the Policy & Implementation Working Group.
45.1 Reading of the motion (Jeff NeumannWolf-Ulrich Knoben)
5 4.2 Discussion of motion.
5 4.3 Vote (Threshold: simple majority in each house 50% i.e. 4 CPH 7 NCPH)
Item 6: MOTION - Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings (15 mins)
...
7.1 Discussion
7.2 Next steps
Item 8: UPDATE & DISCUSSION – GNSO Review (15 mins)
The GNSO Council has previously discussed the action it may take in anticipation of an ICANN Board initiated review.
...
