Page History
Working Group Self-Assessment Questionnaire
Note |
---|
Notes to SCI Members and Other Reviewers: |
|
Note |
Notes to SCI Members and Other Reviewers:
|
...
Welcome and Introduction
Thank you for accepting the invitation to complete this questionnaire concerning your experiences with the __________________________ Working Group (WG). Your Chartering Organization (CO) and other ICANN stakeholders are keenly interested in learning about the effectiveness of its chartered teams by asking participants for their assessments, perspectives, and insights concerning various aspects of the Working Group's operations, norms, logistics, decision-making, and outputs. The results of your feedback will be used to identify improvement areas in the guidelines, tools, methods, templates, and procedures applicable to Working Groups. Summary reports will be shared not only with your Working Group, but the larger GNSO stakeholder community.
...
Info |
---|
In the next three sections (II, III, and IV), you will be asked to rate the EFFECTIVENESS of each dimension; the scale interpretation will be provided appropriate to each element. |
...
I. Inputs ...includes the charter, team members, tools, and resources.
Thinking about
...
the overall EFFECTIVENESS of the Working Group'
...
s Inputs, how would you rate each of the following elements on a scale
...
where 1=Highly Ineffective
...
and 7=Highly Effective:
Assessment Category | Rating | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The | Participation climate within Charter/Mission of the WG where: | inhospitable, unilateral, frustrating, unproductiveconfusing, vague, ill-structured, unbounded, unrealistic (e.g., time, constraints), unachievable; and | 57-Highly Effective means | inviting, democratic, accepting, respectful, productiveunderstandable, clear, well-structured, bounded, realistic (e.g., time, constraints), achievable |
| ||||||||||||||
The | Behavior Expertise of WG members where: | disruptivenovice, | argumentativeelementary, | disrespectfulinapplicable, | hostile, domineeringunusable; and | 57-Highly Effective means | accommodatingknowledgeable, | respectfuladvanced, | collaborativeapplicable, | consensus-buildingusable |
| ||||||||
The Representativeness of WG members where: | 57-Highly Effective means broad, diverse, balanced |
| |||||||||||||||||
The external Human Resources (e.g., briefings, experts, consultants, liaisons) provided to the WG where: |
| ||||||||||||||||||
The Technical Resources (e.g., tools, platforms, support) provided to and utilized by the WG where: |
| ||||||||||||||||||
Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
II. Norms and Operations
Thinking about the overall EFFECTIVENESS of the Working Group's Norms and Operations, how would you rate each of the following elements on a scale where 1=Highly Ineffective and 7=Highly Effective:
Assessment Category | Rating | ||||||||
The Participation climate within the WG where: |
| ||||||||
The Behavior of WG members where: 1-Highly Ineffective means disruptive, argumentative, disrespectful, hostile, domineering; and 7-Highly Effective means accommodating, respectful, collaborative, consensus-building |
| ||||||||
The Decision-Making Methodology (consensus)where: |
| ||||||||
Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
III. Logistics and Requirements
Thinking about the overall EFFECTIVENESS of the Working Group's Logistics and Requirements, how would you rate each of the following elements on a scale where 1=Highly Ineffective and
...
7=Highly Effective:
Assessment Category | Rating | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Session/Meeting Planning (Agenda) where: |
| ||||||||
The Communication/Collaboration Tools provided to and utilized by the WG where: |
| ||||||||
The Briefings and Subject Matter Experts provided to the WG where: |
| ||||||||
Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
...
Thinking about the overall EFFECTIVENESS of the Working Group's Products and Outputs, how would you rate each of the following elements on a scale where 1=Highly Ineffective and 57=Highly Effective:
Assessment Category | Rating | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Working Group's primary Mission where: |
| ||||||||
The Quality of the WG's outputs (a.k.a. deliverables) where: 1-Highly Ineffective means incomplete, inadequate, materially deficient/flawed, unsupported; and 57-Highly Effective means complete, thorough, exhaustive, reasoned, supported |
| ||||||||
Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
...
Assessment Category | Rating | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
My personal Participation in helping the WG achieve its mission where: |
| ||||||||
My personal Fulfillment considering the time, energy, and work efforts I contributed to this WG: |
| ||||||||
How did you learn about the WG?
| Please select one from the drop-down list:
| ||||||||
Approximately how long have you been involved with ICANN: | Please select one from the drop-down list:
| ||||||||
Considering the most recent twelve months, on average, approximately how many hours per week do you spend on ICANN-related activities: | Please select one from the drop-down list:
| ||||||||
Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
...