Page History
Working Group Self-Assessment Questionnaire
Info |
---|
In this Draft v2 version of the questionnaire, I am attempting to take into consideration an evaluative element raised by Mikey O'Connor and overlooked in Draft v1. In thinking broadly about any system, we would normally examine three sub-systems: |
Note |
---|
Notes to SCI Members and Other Reviewers:
|
...
Welcome and Introduction
Thank you for accepting the invitation to complete this questionnaire concerning your experiences with the __________________________ Working Group (WG). Your Chartering Organization (CO) and other ICANN stakeholders are keenly interested in learning about the effectiveness of its chartered teams by asking participants for their assessments, perspectives, and insights concerning various aspects of the Working Group's operations, norms, logistics, decision-making, and outputs. The results of your feedback will be used to identify improvement areas in the guidelines, tools, methods, templates, and procedures applicable to Working Groups. Summary reports will be shared not only with your Working Group, but the larger GNSO stakeholder community.
...
This questionnaire is organized into five sections and should take approximately _____ minutes to complete. Although most of the questions will ask you for an effectiveness rating (1-5 Scale), there will be an opportunity within each major section to add free-form text comments. You are encouraged to provide supplementary explanations or other supporting information that will help the Chartering Organization understand and interpret your input. If there is any individual question for which you do not wish to provide a rating, a SKIP option is available.
I. Personal Identifying Information (Required)
Panel |
---|
Anonymity Provision: Although this assessment instrument is requesting personal identifying information, it is being done ONLY as a preventive measure to ensure that (a) all WG Members' input has been received and (b) any spurious or duplicate entries do not undermine or contaminate the value of the feedback to the Chartering Organization. Please be assured that: (1) your individual responses will not be accessible by anyone other than the ICANN Staff Administrator; and (2) they will not be disclosed or published in a way that could be matched to your identity without your express permission. |
...
Info |
---|
In the next three sections (II, III, and IV), you will be asked to rate the EFFECTIVENESS of each dimension; the scale interpretation will be provided appropriate to each element. |
II. Norms and Operations
Thinking about the overall EFFECTIVENESS of the Working Group's Norms and Operations, how would you rate each of the following elements on a scale where 1=Highly Ineffective and 5=Highly Effective:
Assessment Category | Rating | ||||||
The Participation climate within the WG where: |
| ||||||
The Behavior of WG members where: 1-Highly Ineffective means disruptive, argumentative, disrespectful, hostile, domineering; and 5-Highly Effective means accommodating, respectful, collaborative, consensus-building |
| ||||||
The Representativeness of WG members where: |
| ||||||
The Decision-Making Methodology (consensus)where: |
| ||||||
Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
III. Logistics and Requirements
Thinking about the overall EFFECTIVENESS of the Working Group's Logistics and Requirements, how would you rate each of the following elements on a scale where 1=Highly Ineffective and 5=Highly Effective:
Assessment Category | Rating | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Session/Meeting Planning (Agenda) where: |
| ||||||
The Communication/Collaboration Tools provided to and utilized by the WG where: |
| ||||||
The Briefings and Subject Matter Experts provided to the WG where: |
| ||||||
Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
IV. Products and Outputs
Thinking about the overall EFFECTIVENESS of the Working Group's Products and Outputs, how would you rate each of the following elements on a scale where 1=Highly Ineffective and 5=Highly Effective:
Assessment Category | Rating | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
The Working Group's primary Mission where: |
| ||||||
The Quality of the WG's outputs (a.k.a. deliverables) where: 1-Highly Ineffective means incomplete, inadequate, materially deficient/flawed, unsupported; and 5-Highly Effective means complete, thorough, exhaustive, reasoned, supported |
| ||||||
Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
V. Personal Fulfillment and Demographics
Your Chartering Organization is interested to learn about your own participation and personal fulfillment as a result of having invested time and effort volunteering on a Working Group. In addition, we have included a few demographic questions that will assist in understanding and interpreting your feedback.
Assessment Category | Rating | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
My personal Participation in helping the WG achieve its mission where: |
| ||||||
My personal Fulfillment considering the time, energy, and work efforts I contributed to this WG: |
| ||||||
How did you learn about the WG?
| Please select one from the drop-down list:
| ||||||
Approximately how long have you been involved with ICANN: | Please select one from the drop-down list:
| ||||||
Considering the most recent twelve months, on average, approximately how many hours per week do you spend on ICANN-related activities: | Please select one from the drop-down list:
| ||||||
Comments: | (Free-form Text Box) |
Please feel free to provide any additional comments about your Working Group experience, this Self-Assessment, or any other matter not covered elsewhere in this questionnaire: | (Free-form Text Box) |
THANK YOU FOR YOUR FEEDBACK!
***END***