Page History
Summary of RALO advice received
The RALO's advice to the ALAC were in the form of answers to the 5 questions (see below) with the possible answers of either
- Yes, support the filing of the objection statement by the ALAC against applicant,
- No, NOT support the filing of the objection statement by the ALAC against applicant OR
- Abstain
Objection statements NOT supported by at least three RALOs will not be considered by the ALAC. For those objection statements that are supported by three or more RALOs, the ALAC will decide whether to file such objection statements to the Dispute Resolution Service Provider (DRSP) before the end of the objection period on March 13, 2013.
- 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement against applicant "DotHealth, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
- 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement against applicant "Goose Fest, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
- 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement against applicant "dot Health Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string
- 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement against applicant "Afilias Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string
- 1 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement against applicant "Stable Tone Limited" for the "健康" string
Therefore, the ALAC will have to consider the filing of the
- objection statement against applicant "DotHealth, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
- objection statement against applicant "Goose Fest, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
- objection statement against applicant "dot Health Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string
- objection statement against applicant "Afilias Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string
As the objection statement against applicant "Stable Tone Limited" for the "健康" string failed to get RALO support, this statement will not be considered by the ALAC.
...
5 questions for RALO's advice to the ALAC
The RALO advice to the ALAC requires answers to 5 questions which can either be Yes, No or Abstain:
...
YES, support the filing of the objection statement by the ALAC against applicant "Stable Tone Limited" for the ".健康" string OR
NO, not support the filing of the objection statement by the ALAC against applicant "Stable Tone Limited" for the ".健康" string OR
ABSTAIN
Summary of RALO advice received
The RALO's advice to the ALAC were in the form of answers to the 5 questions with the possible answers of either
- Yes, support the filing of the objection statement by the ALAC against applicant,
- No, NOT support the filing of the objection statement by the ALAC against applicant OR
- Abstain
Objection statements NOT supported by at least three RALOs will not be considered by the ALAC. For those objection statements that are supported by three or more RALOs, the ALAC will decide whether to file such objection statements to the Dispute Resolution Service Provider (DRSP) before the end of the objection period on March 13, 2013.
- 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement against applicant "DotHealth, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
- 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement against applicant "Goose Fest, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
- 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement against applicant "dot Health Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string
- 3 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement against applicant "Afilias Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string
- 1 out of 5 RALOs supported the filing of the objection statement against applicant "Stable Tone Limited" for the "健康" string
Therefore, the ALAC will have to consider the filing of the
- objection statement against applicant "DotHealth, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
- objection statement against applicant "Goose Fest, LLC" for the ".HEALTH" string
- objection statement against applicant "dot Health Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string
- objection statement against applicant "Afilias Limited" for the ".HEALTH" string
As the objection statement against applicant "Stable Tone Limited" for the "健康" string failed to get RALO support, this statement will not be considered by the ALAC.