Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

5.3 Vote (Standard threshold: simple majority of each house).

 


Item 6: MOTION -  Suspension of a Policy Development Process – Proposed revision of the GNSO PDP Manual

 

The GNSO Council requested the Standing Committee on Improvements Implementation (SCI) in April 2012 to review whether there should be a modification to the GNSO PDP Manual to address the possible suspension of a PDP following its initiation. The SCI deliberated on provisions for suspension of a PDP and reached consensus on proposed modifications to be incorporated in Section 15 of the GNSO PDP Manual, which also is included as Annex 2 in the GNSO Council Operating Procedures. The Council is now requested to consider the proposed modifications for adoption.

Refer to motion 3:

http://tinyurl.com/atl39y4:

6 1 Reading of the motion

6.2 Discussion

6.3 Vote

 

 

Item 7Item 6: UPDATE – Trademark Clearinghouse (TMCH) Strawman Proposal and Defensive Registrations Discussion (20 Minutes)

ICANN’s CEO has requested GNSO Council input on the Strawman Proposal  recently developed through the TMCH related implementation discussions, that has been posted for public comment http://www.icann.org/en/news/announcements/announcement-30nov12-en.htm .    ICANN’s CEO additionally requested Council input on the joint proposal from the Business Constituency/Intellectual Property Constituency (BC/IPC) for a “limited preventative registration mechanism” which is also currently available for public comment.   Related to this discussion is the Staff briefing paper http://gnso.icann.org/en/node/32287 to the GNSO Council on the topic of defensive registrations at the second level, in response to a previous request from the New GLTD Committee (2012.04.10.NG2).  The New GTLD Committee requested the GNSO to consider whether additional work on defensive registrations at the second level should be undertaken.  The Council is to discuss: (i) a response to the ICANN CEOs request, and (ii) to consider whether to undertake any additional work related to the BC/IPC proposal and/or the Staff briefing paper, on the topic of second level defensive registrations.

67.1          Update from Staff (Brian Peck)

67.2          Discussion

67.3          Next Steps

 

Item 78: UPDATE - Response to the GAC Letter (15 minutes)

...

7.1 Update
7.2 Discussion
7.3 Next steps

Item 89: UPDATE - ATRT2 Developments (5 minutes)

...

This is a discussion item.

89.1 Update (Wolfe-Ulrich Knoben)
8 9.2 Discussion
8 9.3 Next steps

Item 910: UPDATE –  Next Steps-  WHOIS Board Resolution (10 minutes)

...

This is a discussion item.

 

910.1 Update
9 10.2 Discussion
9 10.3 Next steps

 

Item 1011: INFORMATION - GNSO Council Review and SIC Update (15 minutes)

In Toronto, the Chair of the SIC provided an overview of a new framework for future independent review efforts at ICANN.  The GNSO was used as a case study to describe the effort because it is the first Supporting Organization lined-up in the next review cycle. Staff will brief the Council on the set of criteria metrics for GNSO Stakeholder Groups and Constituencies, and the work underway to develop metrics for the Council and the Working Group Model of policy.

1011.1          Update from Staff (Rob Hogarth)

1011.2          Discussion

1011.3          Next Steps


 Item 1112:  Any Other Business (5 minutes)

1112.1 Liaison to ccNSO - John Berard volunteered - approve

Appendix 1: GNSO Council Voting Thresholds (ICANN Bylaws, Article X, Section 3)
9. Except as otherwise specified in these Bylaws, Annex A hereto, or the GNSO Operating Procedures, the default threshold to pass a GNSO Council motion or other voting action requires a simple majority vote of each House. The voting thresholds described below shall apply to the following GNSO actions:

...