Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

ICANN requests feedback from all interested and affected stakeholders on whether these proposed KPIs define good performance of allocation of IPv4 Internet addresses or whether there are other indicators that might be better.
 


AreaKPIICANN'

...

Internal Target
AccuracyBegin allocation once the trigger has been reached100%
AccuracyCorrect implementation of policy formula100%
Timeliness & Process 
Quality
Make allocations on the first business day of each allocation period100%

Transparency

Make ICANN's public announcement within two business days of updating the registry

100%

 

Proposed Updates: IPv6 Allocation & AS Number Allocation

 
Some performance indicators that ICANN has considered related to the IPv6 allocation and AS Number Allocation are listed below, and ICANN is offering these as potential KPIs in order to encourage discussion. These are the KPIs and targets ICANN currently uses.
ICANN encourages the five RIRs and any other interested and affected parties to provide feedback on how appropriate and reasonable the suggested KPIs and targets are.

 

AreaKPIICANN's Internal Target
AccuracyPolicy is correctly implemented100%
AccuracyRegistry is updated before notifying requester of allocation100%
Timeliness & Process QualityNo more than two replies to the requester:
1) AUTO- ACK from the ticketing system;
2) notification of allocation
100%
TransparencyMake ICANN's public announcement about the allocation within two business days of updating the registry100%

 


 


Consultation Questions
ICANN is seeking feedback on performance standards for the IANA Function related to allocation of Internet Numbers. Comments are welcome on any aspect of the performance standards, and specifically on the following questions:
1. Are the KPIs and targets developed by ICANN meaningful performance standards for delivering the IPv4 allocation service, the IPv6 allocation service, and the AS Number allocation service?
2. Are there other KPIs that might be good measures of successful performance of the IPv4 allocation service, IPv6 allocation service, and the AS Number allocation service?
3. In what formats would you like the results reported to the community?

4. Do you have additional input on suitable performance standards for the allocation of
Internet Numbering Resources?