Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

http://toronto45.icann.org/node/34121

 

09:0009:30SSACStéphanePatrik Faltstrom/ Jim Galvin
09:3010:3000Fake Renewal NoticesQ&A session with council chair candidatesStéphane Marika Konings
10:300011:30Preparation for Discussion of Board and ccNSO Meeting (coffee served)Q&A session with council chair candidatesStéphaneStéphane 
11:3012:15New gTLDs, Trademark Clearing House, URSStéphaneKurt Pritz, Karen Lentz
12:1513:00Lunch and room preparation for meeting with Board  
13:0014:30Board / GNSO joint meetingStéphane 
14:3015:15Impact of New gTLDs on ICANN's structureStéphaneThomas Rickert
15:1515:30Break   
15:3015:50Locking of a Domain Name subject to UDRP Proceedings: update, issues, timeline

What is it about: Status update on the activities of the Locking of a Domain Name Subject to UDRP Proceedings PDP Working Group

Background information: This PDP WG is tasked to address the locking of a domain name subject to Uniform Dispute Resolution Policy (UDRP) proceedings. For further information, please see https://community.icann.org/display/udrpproceedings/Home.

Stéphane

Marika Konings

Michele Neylon, Chair
Alan Greenberg, Vice-Chair of the WG

15:5016:10Uniformity of Contracts: final issues report, recommendations
StéphaneRob Hoggarth
16:1016:30Fake Renewal Notices
Uniformity of Reporting
  

What is it about: ICANN Staff will brief the GNSO Council about the Initial Report on Uniformity of Contracts commissioned by the Council. It is expected that the GNSO Council will discuss the report in Toronto and subsequently determine whether to initiate a PDP on the matter.

Background information: The request for an Issue Report on this topic follows the work of the Registration Abuse Policies Working Group (RAPWG). The RAPWG was tasked by the GNSO Council with defining abuse, making a determination between registration abuse versus use abuse, defining the most common forms of abuse, and understanding the effectiveness of abuse provisions within agreements in order to identify and recommend specific policy issues and processes for further consideration by the GNSO Council.

 

The RAPWG recommended in its Final Report “the creation of an Issues Report to evaluate whether a minimum baseline of registration abuse provisions should be created for all in-scope ICANN agreements, and if created, how such language would be structured to address the most common forms of registration abuse.”

The GNSO Council subsequently asked Staff to prepare an Issue Report to evaluate this recommendation last year. Staff posted a Preliminary Issue Report on Uniformity of Contracts on 25 July 2012 for public comment and produced a summary of the community comments on the topic.

StéphaneRob Hoggarth
16:1016:3016:3017:00Meeting with NomCom re skill-sets needed for Nominating Committee Appointees (NCAs)StéphaneVanda