Page History
(Lost, at least for now, access to the Etherpad I started so lost a few comments, will keep trying to renew it but people should add their comments here. Anyone who does not have access should contact ICANN Staff - need specific reference - for assistance)Snapshot taken from http://willyou.typewith.me/p/BlueSky%20-%20Objection%20Process
Blue sky exercise - questions, possible requirements and possible solutions
- Is the At-Large objection process a review of all applications (simlar to the reported GAC process) or an exception process where only applications that are raised by the community (by the At-Large Community)
Wiki Markup <CLO> My first thought on this choice is the latter => a Community Objection raised by the At-Large ( or can it be at-large??? why not?) Internet Users if it is At-Large then we should probably also consider a minimum (or threshhold of support { X # of ALSes or Regions etc., in favour of the 'Objection on behalf of a/the \[identified\] Community ) that sort of thing... BUT that is a first reaction I can see where a parallel to GAC review plans might also work but then why not let them be Pro-Active from their 'unique POV and we ( ALAC and At-Large) act as conduit for *genuine* Communuity concerns that has may not fit the GAC 'filter' Yes that might be Re-active but ... ... ...)
- Is there estimate of how many applicatons we expect to be subject to ATAt-LArge Large objection process or objection process review
- <CLO> nope not to my knowledge but I would have thought the number reasonable low like N=<3-5 or so
- Are there, or should there be, tools to aid in the process.
- <CLO> yup and they need to be accessable accountable and transparant....
- if so what sort of tools?
- <CLO> darn good question => in this we must consider MUCH more...
