Page History
1. Motion on the Adoption of the IRTP Part B Recommendation #3 (Issue Report on ‘Thick’ WHOIS)
Made by:Tim Ruiz
Seconded by: Stéphane van Gelder
...
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
2. Motion regarding the nature of Internet-based criminal activity and the information and tools available to help address crime that involves the domain name system;
Made by: Tim Ruiz
Seconded by:
...
b. The purpose of these monitoring and reporting requirements are to allow the GNSO to determine when, if ever, these recommendations and any ensuing policy require additional amendment, clarification or attention based on the results of the reports prepared by ICANN staff.
...
3. Initiation of a Policy Development Process (PDP) on the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part C
Made by: Tim Ruiz
Seconded by:
...
A Working Group will be created for the purpose of fulfilling the requirements of the PDP.
...
4. Motion for Approval of a Charter for the Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Part C Working Group (WG)
Made by: Tim Ruiz
Seconded by:
...
The Working Group shall follow the rules outlined in the GNSO Working Group Guidelines http://gnso.icann.org/council/annex-1-gnso-wg-guidelines-07apr11-en.pdf.
...
5. MOTION RE. REVISION OF THE GNSO COUNCIL OPERATING PROCEDURES RELATING TO PROXY VOTING
Made by: Wolf-Ulrich Knoben
Seconded by: Stéphane van Gelder
...
RESOLVED, in response to Gripe Sites; Deceptive and/or Offensive Domain Names recommendation #1, the GNSO Council acknowledges receipt of this recommendation, and agrees with the RAPWG that no further action is called for at this time.
...
7. Motion for the Joint SO/AC Working Group on New gTLD Applicant Support FINAL REPORT
Made by: Rafik Dammak
Seconded by:
Whereas:
The GNSO Council and ALAC established the Joint SO/AC Working Group (JASWG) on support for new gTLD applicants in April of 2010; and
The Joint SO/AC Working Group released its second Milestone Report, posted for consideration by the Board, Chartering Organizations and at-large Community. This report documented the completion of work as defined in the extended charter and,
The Joint SO/AC Working Group received and discussed the public comments, and
The Joint SO/AC Working Group has completed the enumerated items as defined in its extended charter and has published a final report (https://community.icann.org/display/jaswg/JAS+Issues+and+Recommendations#) on 14 September 2011 covering those chartered items (http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#20110113-1) entitled Final Report of the Joint SO/AC new GTLD applicant support working group. and
The Joint SO/AC Working Group is still in the process of completing some last tasks including completion of the formal documentation of the comment responses for the second milestone community review, and
The GNSO council does not wish to delay implementation of support programs for applicants from developing regions,
Resolved:
The GNSO Council thanks the members of the Joint SO/AC Working Group for its efforts and its dedication to completing these work items on such a tight schedule, and
The GNSO Council approves forwarding the final Report to the ICANN Board for review and approval, and
The GNSO Council request ICANN staff begin working on implementation of the recommendations , and
The GNSO Council requests that the Joint SO/AC Working Group complete the publication of its formal Milestone 2 response document as quickly as possible, and
The GNSO Council requests that the Joint SO/AC Working Group remain on call to review the outcome of the ICANN implementation of the JAS recommendations.
Resolved further, that the GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Chair to communicate its decision to the ALAC Chair.
______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________________
8. MOTION TO CREATE JOINT WORKING GROUP ON CONSUMER CHOICE, COMPETITION, AND INNOVATION (CCI):
Made by: Rosemary Sinclair
Seconded by:
...
Resolved further, that in the event that no other SO/AC approves of the terms of this Charter http://gnso.icann.org/drafts/cci-charter-07sep11-en.pdf, the CCI WG shall continue to proceed as a GNSO Council chartered joint Working Group.
...
89. Draft Motion to approve charter for Whois Survey Working Group (WS-WG)
Made by: Wendy Seltzer
Seconded by:
...
