Page History

Monday, 09 January 2023 at 12:30 UTC

I. Remaining Use Case Examples

1. The goal is to complete the discussion of remaining examples and build understanding about which ones should be carried forward into future deliberations.

II. Framework Assumptions

1. A review of your work thus far has indicated the group may have agreement on some broad assumptions. We will discuss these and how they may impact a framework.

III. AOB

1. Discussion about a Closed Generics document that has been shared with a community group.
2. Questions about GPI Framework exercise.

I. Discuss Framework assumptions
II. Discuss emerging categories where closed gTLD's may be appropriate within a public interest framing
III. Discuss the unique characteristics of closed gTLD's
IV. AOB
      a. F2F meeting information

ACTION TO COMPLETE before the call: Asynchronous Work #5 and #6

I.Discuss how to build the framework of Block 3, Contracting & Post-Delegation

II.You will receive Asynchronous Work #7, which will ask you to identify what is missing from current definitions and how you propose to address the identified gap(s)

III. AOB

I. Discuss outstanding Public Interest considerations, including whether a stated public interest(s) must also serve a broader public interest – OR – if the standard should be to do no harm to the broader public interest. Our goal is shared understanding of how the public interest should be considered in the application.

 II. You will receive Asynchronous Work #8, which will ask you to identify how an applicant should address threats, risks, and/or disadvantaged sectors

III. AOB

I. Discuss Asynchronous Work #7. Our goal is a shared understanding of how relevant terms should be considered in the application

II. AOB

I. Discuss Asynchronous Work #8. Our goal is shared understanding of how an applicant should address threats, risk and/or disadvantaged sectors.

II. AOB

    a. meet in a hybrid session on Saturday, 11 March to continue Block 2 discussions

I. Discussion regarding the public interest.

II. What can be built into the application and/or evaluation to ensure the public interest is properly assessed?

III. AOB

• Discuss meeting schedule
• Discuss when other org functions should be brought into your closed generic work
• Review the Executive Summary portion of Discussion Draft: Preliminary Framework for Closed Generic gTLDS v2.
• Continue review of the rest of the document, time allowing
• AOB

1. I. Review scheduling inputs from mailing list - 5 minutes
2. II. Resume analysis of the Discussion Draft v2 at bottom of page 10
3. III. AOB

We will move through this document in the following manner:

• Section III.  Applying for a Closed Generic gTLD
• Section IV. Evaluating a Closed Generic gTLD Application
• Section V. Contracting & Post-Delegation Review
• Definitions
• Policy questions and possible implementation questions based on group discussions to date
  • I don’t anticipate getting into the substance of these and will simply ask if the areas detailed properly encapsulate other conversations had by this group

• Discussion Draft v2: Red line questions for Section V – Contracting and Post-Delegation
• Red line discussion: Objective/Subjective 
• Red line discussion: Application Comment/Objections/ Evaluation Challenges, time allowing
• After this call, I will ask you work asynchronously to identify possible solutions to your Notable Concerns within the v3 document and I will provide more detail about our approach to the other red line issues.

• Red line discussion: Application Comment/Objections/Evaluation Challenges
• Red line discussion: Scoring System
• Red line discussion: Necessary
• Other red line issues, time allowing
• You will continue to work asynchronously identifying solutions to your Notable Concerns within the v3 document

• Other red line issues
• Notable concern matters in v3

• Other red line issues
• Notable concern matters in v3

• Group reviews final framework including minority statements

• You will each decide: 

• If you support the final framework, including with minority statements narrowly tailored to specific elements   OR
• If you do not support the final framework