Page History
...
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Zoom Recording (including audio, visual, rough transcript and chat) GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK: WG members to review the revised clean version of the working document dated 01 May 2023 at: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bU_QTPqYKvwOp0l90sHLigCNmTE8Ykvrx59FlPelTjQ/edit?usp=sharing. The focus should be on sections 5 and 6, but if members have comments on earlier sections they should highlight them in an email to the WG list, rather than in comments in the document.
Notes:
2. Continued Discussion of Goals and Metrics Relating to Tasks 3, 4, 5 -- Draft Suggested Revision (60 min) Clean: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Ahkm59-2wCjyjdOIR0k17LKMH6EwJ2QGFygyChEYjNg/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com] (for discussion – set to comment) Redline: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1DZ0wng7k71QraQCXRRJLLxflCdnhnVFnZODkNK5sf4E/edit?usp=sharing [docs.google.com] (for reference -- set to view only)
Comment from Gabriela Mattausch: Is it possible to include public sector? Discussion:
Comment from Gabriella re: “under-developed”: I suggest to use the UN standard for statistical use: "developing regions and countries" (https://unstats.un.org/unsd/methodology/m49/#fn2). Discussion:
Comment from Roz: Can industry standards be defined in this context? Would need to know what that looks like/what specific metric that will be measured against if we are going to sign up to it. Discussion:
Comment from Roz re: Qualitative Measurements: Could we be more specific here - "written survey results" or something to indicate that the surveys should provide boxes for written feedback/input. Discussion:
2. Business Case – Recommendation 2: Comment from Roz: Re: suggestion to add text: “and other resources as deemed required.” to capture the initial intent of the sentence, suggesting that helpful resources might go beyond pro-bono services. Discussion:
Comment from Roz re: Metrics: I still think we need a metric on conversation rates here, per the language above "Conversion rates of applicants who applied or determined that an application was not appropriate for them" Discussion:
3. ICANN org set up of ASP for success – Recommendation 3: No comments. 4. Application Submission and Evaluation – Recommendation 4: Comment from Roz re: “Facilitate successful applications in the Applicant Support Program among those who may need and could qualify for support.” I think it's important to keep this language - we want to facilitate successful applications among those who may need/could qualify for support, as that's the end aim/goal of this programme. Discussion:
Next Meeting: Start at section 5, recommendation 5. |