Page History
ALAC: Advice to the ICANN Board on Subsequent Procedures (R-02C)
Date Issued | Document | Reference ID | Current Phase |
---|---|---|---|
| ALAC: Advice to the ICANN Board on Subsequent Procedures (R-02C) | AL-ALAC-ST-0421-02-01-EN (R-02C) | Phase 2 | Understand |
DESCRIPTION
Our concerns also remain over the seemingly lack of policy direction in respect of CCTRT Recommendation #12 (to do with user expectation regarding the relationship of content of a gTLD to its name), an omission which we hope the ICANN Board will consider addressing.
DEPENDENCIES
Progress pending the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Final Report.
STATUS UPDATES
Date | Phase | Type | Status Updates |
---|---|---|---|
| Phase 2 | Phase Update | As noted at the joint Board-ALAC session at ICANN75, the Board greatly appreciates the ALAC's responses to the Board's questions. The Board continues to review and consider the ALAC advice, to determine whether, in addition to informing the Board’s deliberations, there are actionable items that may require Board action before (or after) the Board takes action on the SubPro policy recommendations. The Board anticipates that this exercise will be completed in the first half of 2023 and that a response to the advice would come at the time of action on the SubPro Final Report – or shortly thereafter. |
| Phase 2 | AP Feedback | Our response is twofold: First, those recommendations that have been accepted by the Board and were designated as “prerequisite” by the CCRT should, in fact, be fully implemented prior to a new round of applications for gTLD strings. Second, the ALAC will endeavor to revisit the CCT recommendations, as a whole, and look for ways to restate some of them as new ALAC Advice which is more topical and doesn’t suffer from the dispersion of the CCTRT recommendations. We will coordinate with the former members of the CCTRT, the GAC and the SSRT2 members to cull and modernize our specific Advice. |
| Phase 2 | Clarifying Question | The Board has reminded the ALAC that the CCT Recommendations do not exist as a monolith and, instead fall in to several different categories, including those recommendations which fall outside the Board’s remit to act, those which are in the process of being implemented and those still being evaluated by ICANN org (staff). The Board proposes the ALAC consider reframing any CCT recommendations that are not being actively implemented, but remain a priority, be restated as new Advice to the Board. |
| Phase 2 | Phase Change | Now Phase 2 |
| Phase 1 | Phase Update | Acknowledgment sent to ALAC. |
| Phase 1 | Phase Update | ALAC published AL-ALAC-ST-0421-02-01-EN: Advice to the ICANN Board on Subsequent Procedures: https://atlarge.icann.org/advice_statements/13823. |