Page History
...
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Audio Recording Zoom Recording Chat Transcript GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK: ACTION ITEM: Re: TDRP -- Staff to research whether there are materials describing the goals of the TDRP.
Notes:
2. Welcome and Chair Updates
3. Introduction to Transfer Dispute Resolution Policy Working Document [docs.google.com]and discussion Overview of the Working Document:
ACTION ITEM: Re: TDRP -- Staff to research whether there are materials describing the goals of the TDRP. Poll: Q1: As it currently stands, do you believe the TDRP is an effective dispute resolution mechanism?
Discussion/Results:
Q2: Is the current statute of limitations for the TDRP appropriate? In other words, is 12 months from the date of the alleged improper transfer an acceptable deadline to file a TDRP complaint?
Discussion/Results:
Discussion/Results:
Q4: Currently, only registrars have standing to file a TDRP claim. Is this appropriate, or should registrants also have the ability to file a TDRP claim?
Discussion/Results:
Q5: Are the current reporting requirements appropriate to enable future review of the TDRP?
Discussion/Results:
For next meeting: Q6: Are requirements for the processing of registration data, as specified in the TDRP, compliant with data protection law?
Q7: Based on the WG’s discussion to date, do you believe additional mechanisms (other than TEAC or TDRP) may be necessary to resolve improper transfers?
4. AOB |