Page History
...
Info | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Audio Recording Zoom Recording Chat Transcript GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar |
Note | ||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Notes/ Action Items ACTION ITEMS/HOMEWORK:
Notes:
2. Welcome and Chair Updates 3. Proposed Work Plan Update & Project Change Request
Summary: Original phased approach: Phase 1(a):
Phase 1(b):
Phase 2:
As a reminder, the phased approach initially seemed logical for two reasons:
Original timing:
Why is a change needed?
Proposed change: Combine Phase 1 and Phase 2 into a single body of work, with a combined Initial Report and Final Report covering all topics. Reorder the sequence in which topics are addressed by the PDP to account for dependencies between topics. Proposed work plan:
Benefits of the proposed change:
Additional Considerations:
Next steps:
Discussion/Questions:
4. Proposed redline from Small Group on Exemption for Recommendation 16 and 17
ACTION ITEM: Small Team on Exemption for Recommendation 16 and 17 to send proposed language and rationale to the list before the next meeting. 5. Rationale for Recommendation 13 - Registry enforcement of TTL Enforcement
Draft Rationale: The purpose of the standard TTL is to enforce security around unused TACs (e.g., requested/received but not used), in a situation where the TAC may be stored in a registrant’s email or other communications storage. The working group supports the CPH TechOps conclusion that the TAC TTL should be no more than 14 calendar days and notes that a 14-day period is appropriate in order to accommodate transfer-related business processes associated with different registrar models. The working group extensively discussed whether the Registry or Registrar should enforce the 14-day TTL and requested community input on this question through public comment on the Phase 1A Initial Report. The working group recommends enforcement by the Registry for the following reasons:
With respect to 13.2, the working group acknowledged that there may be a variety of circumstances in which the Registrar of Record and the registrant may want to mutually agree to reset the TAC to NULL prior to the end of the 14th calendar day. The working group included this language to ensure that Registrars are permitted to do so under relevant circumstances. Discussion:
ACTION ITEM: Small Team on TTL enforcement to send proposed rationale to the list before the next meeting. 6. AOB: Revised Swimlane – see attached.
|