Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.


Please let the CPWG Co-Chairs and/or staff know by Tuesday, 1 March 23:59 UTC whether you would like to volunteer to draft 2-3 bullet points on recent or ongoing At-Large positions on policy and other end user issues in ICANN, such as:

  • Universal Acceptance
    1. Big improvements have been made with long TLDs
    2. Long way to go for IDNs.
    3. Measurable improvement should proceed a new round.

...

  • Global Public Interest Framework
    • The PIF is a pilot
    • Remains to be seen if it's useful
    • Need to ensure that individual internet users are central to "public interest"


  • IDNs
      Recommendation Prioritization
      • Security and usability require more than allowing variant TLDs to be made available unchecked.
      •  technical, operational, legal, community/linguistic factors require management policies or implementation guidance to enhance the end-user experience with IDNs and their variant TLDs.
    • Registrar Transfer
      1. Significant work in securing notifying Registered Name Holders (RNH) in the different phases
      2. Focus on establish a secure Transfer Authorization Code (TAC), inc. time to live for the TAC
      3. «Consensus" that the 60 days transfer locks (after create and transfer) is too long. 


    Please reference talking points from prior ICANN meetings (67-72) on the At-Large website:

    ...