Page History
...
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Attendance-CRM Apologies: Barbara Knight (RySG), Owen Smigelski (RrSG) Alternates: Beth Bacon (RySG), Essie Musailov (RrSG) |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Action Items -- See: TAC Working Document [docs.google.com] Recommendation 3: ACTION ITEM: WG to suggest/comment on the current language and suggest changes if any. Beth Bacon volunteered also to consult with the RySG. WG members to review the RFC at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9154/ [datatracker.ietf.org] Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Secure Authorization Information for Transfer. Recommendation 5: ACTION ITEM: WG members to review the recommendation and ask whether it helps to answer any of the charter questions or address a security issue. Recommendations 6 and 7: ACTION ITEM: WG members to provide suggestions for requirements for the one-way hash and Beth Bacon to use that information to consult with the RySG. WG members to review and comment on the suggested new wording combining recommendations 6 and 7. Recommendation 9: ACTION ITEM: Revise the recommendation to say that “The Working Group recommends that the TAC [MUST be used no more than once per domain name].” New text in brackets. Recommendation 11: ACTION ITEM: WG members to review 11.2 and consider whether to comment or suggest changes, and revisit at the next meeting. Transfer Policy Review Phase 1 - Meeting #30 Tuesday 04 January 2022 at 16:00 UTC
2. Welcome & Chair updates (5 minutes): No updates provided. 3. Second reading: TAC and FOA (45 minutes) TAC Working Document [docs.google.com] (beginning on p. 15) Recommendation 3:
Recommendation 3: ACTION ITEM: WG to suggest/comment on the current language and suggest changes if any. Beth Bacon volunteered also to consult with the RySG. WG members to review the RFC at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9154/ [datatracker.ietf.org] Extensible Provisioning Protocol (EPP) Secure Authorization Information for Transfer.
Recommendation 5:
Recommendation 5: ACTION ITEM: WG members to review the recommendation and ask whether it helps to answer any of the charter questions or address a security issue. [Additional Candidate Recommendation xx: If a Gaining Registrar requests a transfer and an inter-registrar transfer lock is in place, the transfer must not proceed.]
Recommendations 6 and 7:
ACTION ITEM: WG members to provide suggestions for requirements for the one-way hash and Beth Bacon to use that information to consult with the RySG. WG members to review and comment on the suggested new wording combining recommendations 6 and 7.
Recommendation 8:
Recommendation 9:
ACTION ITEM: Revise the recommendation to say that “The Working Group recommends that the TAC [MUST be used no more than once per domain name].” New text in brackets. Recommendation 11:
Recommendation 11: ACTION ITEM: WG members to review 11.2 and consider whether to comment or suggest changes, and revisit at the next meeting. 4. AOB (5 minutes): Next call: Tuesday 11 January 2021 at 16:00 UTC |