Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

RESOLVED, the GNSO Council requests an Issue Report on the requirement of ‘thick’ WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs. Such an Issue Report and possible subsequent Policy Development Process should not only consider a possible requirement of 'thick' WHOIS or all incumbent gTLDs in the context of IRTP, but should also consider any other positive and/or negative effects that are likely to occur outside of IRTP that would need to be taken into account when deciding whether a requirement of 'thick' WHOIS for all incumbent gTLDs would be desirable or not. (IRTP Part B Recommendation #3)

2. Motion to extend the mandate of the Joint ccNSO/GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG)

Made by: Rafik Dammak

Seconded by:

Whereas

The Joint ccNSO/GNSO IDN Working Group (JIG) was created by mutual charters of the ccNSO (http://ccnso.icann.org/workinggroups/jiwg-charter.pdf) and the GNSO (http://gnso.icann.org/resolutions/#200907); and

Both the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Implementation Plan and the new gTLD process have been approved by the Board of Directors, bringing into effect the JIG charter condition: Upon adoption of either the IDN ccTLD Fast Track Implementation Plan or the new gTLD process by the ICANN Board of Directors, the WG will be closed, unless both the ccNSO and GNSO Council extend the duration of the JIG WG.; and

The JIG identified 3 issues of common interest: 1. Single Character IDN TLDs; 2. IDN Variant TLDs; and, 3. Universal Acceptance of IDN TLDs;  and

The JIG has delivered a first report  on Item 1  “Implementation of Single Character IDN TLD” to the ccNSO council and the GNSO council on 30 March 2011; and

The GNSO Council and the ccNSO Council approved the report on April 7, 2011 and May 10, 2011 respectively; and

The final report  on the first item of interest was delivered to the ICANN Board on May 11, 2011; and

Two issues of common interest remain from the JIG charter; and

The JIG WG has discussed and proposed the following target timeline for completion of the remaining items of common interest:
       • 2011 Jul/Aug: Stocktaking & Development Initial Report for #3 (Public comments Sep 2011)
       • 2011 Sep/Oct: Completion of Initial Report for #2 (Public comments Nov 2011)
       • 2011 Nov/Dec: Completion of Draft Final Report for #2 (Public comments Feb/Mar 2012)
       • 2012 Jan/Feb: Completion of Draft Final Report for #3 (Public comments Feb/Mar 2012)
       • 2012 Mar: Finalization of Final Report for #2
       • 2012 Apr: Finalization of Final Report for #3
       • 2012 May-Oct: Implementation Follow up

Resolved

The JIG Working Group is extended through 2012 to complete work items Two (2.  IDN Variant TLDs) and Three (3. Universal Acceptance of IDN TLDs ) from the original charter.

3. Motion on the Adoption of the PEDNR Final Report and Recommendations

 

Made by: Tim Ruiz

 

Seconded by: Stéphane van Gelder

...