Page History
Action items identified during plenary meetings & calls are reported in the tables below:
- Amy to set up working sessions based on subject, for team members to attend, get questions answered, and complete their assigned sessions.
OPEN QUESTIONS
Status | Data Related Questions |
| Is DITL data sufficient to analyze long term trends? | |
| What additional signal is gained by adding additional roots? (in other words, What is the profile of query data from other roots besides A & J?) | |
| Given a set of strings observed at the root from an open recursive resolver, how does the traffic volume and other characteristics appear at the recursive? (in other words, What is the profile of query data as seen from resolvers that query roots? i.e. popular resolvers such as Google, Quad9, OpenDNS?) | |
| What bias is there in the geographic location of query data? Do query profiles differ by region or ISP? Do each roots have a bias in the query traffic they see due to peering agreements or anycast instance placement over other roots? (minor question) | |
| Give a set of strings observed at the root that are mainly Qname minimized, how does the traffic differ at the recursive? | |
| What was the change in query profile traffic (before and after) when some of the newer TLDs were delegated? | |
| Given the set of ICANN collision reports, is there any signal pre/post-delegation of the string that in hindsight could have indicated name collision risk? | |
| How do new strings (Crypto, Eth, etc.), that have purposely elected to use non-delegated TLDs, occur in the public global DNS? | |
| Where do the low, medium, and high risk strings of 2012 appear in overall traffic volume distribution? | |
| What is the query profile from within an organization that uses one of the TLDs under analysis (e.g. .corp)? | |
...
