Page History
...
Topic | Entry Date (E) ____________ Target Date (T) | Action Item | Responsible Council Member ____ Responsible Staff member | Additional Notes | |||||||||||||||||||
Confirmation of volunteers for Council liaisons to PDP/IRTs Proposed amendments to CPIF
|
|
| Proposed amendments to CPIF | ||||||||||||||||||||
CSC Effectiveness Review Final Report
| 22 Aug
|
| k drazek Pam Little Rafik DammakPhilippe Fouquart Marika Konings Steve Chan CSC Effectiveness Review Final Report | ||||||||||||||||||||
Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance
| 13 Mar
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Status | PDP updates
|
| 26 Jun
|
| Philippe Fouquart Maarten Simon | Marika Konings Steve ChanPDP updates | |||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IFR team |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||
Managing IDN Variants TLDs |
|
|
| Managing IDN Variants TLDs
|
|
|
|
| Regarding the JIG format, the small team is not ready to look at that yet. but it's on their radar. | ||||||||||||||
PDP 3.0 Small Group
|
|
| Regarding the JIG format, the small team is not ready to look at that yet. but it's on their radar. | PDP 3.0 Small Group
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||
EPDP phase 1 recommendations |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
RPM Charter amendments
TO BE MOVED TO PROJECT LIST |
|
| Marika Konings Nathalie Peregrine RPM Charter amendments | These actions are pending the Council's approval of a RPM Charter addendum to handle the Recommendation 5 referral via a separate work track. See below for an update on drafting work concerning this referral. | |||||||||||||||||||
Confirmation of volunteers for Council liaisons to PDP/IRTs
| Blue
| IN PROGRESS |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms
|
|
| Draft 3.7 Appeal Process document sent to PDP3.0 small team for incorporation into PDP3.0 work. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Legislative Tracker
|
|
| ICANN Org will propose next steps to community leaders at ICANN66. | ||||||||||||||||||||
ICANN Org's Request for Clarification on Data Accuracy and Phase 2-of the EPDP on the temporary specification on gTLD Registration Data
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Invitation to provide feedback on the ICANN Board's Proposed Public Interest Framework
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
EPDP Phase 2 Work plan package
|
|
| No input received regarding the work plan. Target delivery dates, while aggressive, was also confirmed after the LA face-to-face session. | ||||||||||||||||||||
Draft Amendments to the review of the Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in all gTLDS Charter to integrate Rec 5 From IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanism Final Report
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Draft response to questions on the Independent Review Process Oversight Team (IRP-IOT)
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
CCT-RT Recommendations |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Potential dependencies between the NCAP and New gTLD Subsequent Procedures
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Verisign request to defer enforcement of the Thick WHOIS transition policy
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
Request for Clarification on Data Accuracy and Phase-2 of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
PDP3.0 updates
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
IRP IOT |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
ATRT3 Survey
|
|
| No GNSO Council response to ATRT3 survey deemed necessary. |
...