Page History
...
Topic | Entry Date (E) ____________ Target Date (T) | Action Item | Responsible Council Member ____ Responsible Staff member |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
ATRT3 Survey
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Confirmation of volunteers for Council liaisons to PDP/IRTs
|
|
| PDP3.0 updates | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed amendments to CPIF
|
|
| Berry Cobb | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Proposed amendments to CPIF IRP IOT
| 22 Aug |
k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak Marika Konings Steve Chan | IRP IOT |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
RPM Charter amendments
|
|
| These actions are pending the Council's approval of a RPM Charter addendum to handle the Recommendation 5 referral via a separate work track. See below for an update on drafting work concerning this referral. | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Legislative Tracker
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CSC Effectiveness Review Final Report
|
|
| Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance
| 13 Mar
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
PDP updates |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPDP Phase 2 Work plan package | Managing IDN Variants TLDs |
| 18 Apr
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
EPDP phase 1 recommendations |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Request for Clarification on Data Accuracy and Phase-2 of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Regarding the JIG format, the small team is not ready to look at that yet. but it's on their radar. | PDP3.0 updates |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Managing IDN Variants TLDs |
|
|
| Regarding the JIG format, the small team is not ready to look at that yet. but it's on their radar. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report |
Status | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|
|
- Council leadership to propose path forward to obtain clarification / provide view concerning intersection between the Name Collisions Analysis Project and SubPro PDP
- ICANN Staff to consider timing for GNSO Policy webinar (e.g., two weeks prior). ICANN Staff to consider suggested changes to slide format raised during meeting.
- Council leadership to provide guidance to SubPro PDP on how to navigate interdependent topics (e.g., assumptions doc, Name Collisions Analysis Project, string similarity, IDNs) and potentially dependent PDPs (e.g., RPMs).
- Council leadership to draft a note to the ICANN Board on NCAP.
- Council leadership to draft a note to the ccNSO on string similarity and IDNs (together or separate).
- Input for future updates, Council to suggest one presenter. Also, focus on post-ICANN meeting updates.
Rafik Dammak Pam Little k drazek
ICANN Org assumptions for new round of new gTLDs Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Council to further consider next steps in relation to the review of the Transfer Policy (which could include the chartering of a narrowly focused EPDP) which would result in providing GDD information/response on expected next steps and/or seek additional information as the Council considers how to approach the Transfer Policy review, for example, holistically instead of piecemeal. The Council anticipates receiving input from the Registrars Stakeholder Group on the Review of the Transfer Policy as well as the request for the suspension of the contractual compliance enforcement of the FOA.
- Rubens Kuhl, as Council liaison, to reach out to the IRT for the EPDP Phase 1 to have a conversation and gain a better understanding of how to address recommendation 24 and the Form of Authorization issue stemming from the Temporary Specification. Marked completed as it has been confirmed that the EPDP Phase 1 will not address the FOA issue beyond the changes that have been recommended by the EPDP Phase 1.
IFR team Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Once the Council receives the receipt for IFR membership confirmation, Council to consider how best to coordinate co-chair selection with ccNSO, which will be responsible for selecting the ccNSO co-chair.
- Council to consider selection process by which a GNSO appointed member of the IANA Function Review (IFR) team will be selected to serve as the GNSO co-chair on the IFR as the ICANN Bylaws stipulate that “(d) The IFRT shall be led by two co-chairs: one appointed by the GNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (c)-(f) of Section 18.7 and one appointed by the ccNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (a)-(b) of Section 18.7” once the IFR membership has been confirmed.
- IANA Function Review (IFR) Team composition: Review of the ccNSO proposal to manage deficiencies - Councilors to take discussion on ccNSO proposal (here: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2019-January/022175.html) to their respective SG/C and to then consider what input they would like to provide.
ICANN Org assumptions for new round of new gTLDs
- Council to consider if they would like to provide a written response to ICANN Org, to be delivered by the end of September. Councilors to inform their respective SG/Cs of the timeline for providing input.
Rafik Dammak k drazek Pam Little
CCT-RT recommendations
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Council to convene small team to consider CCT-RT recommendations referred to the GNSO and GNSO PDPs and determine next steps (Volunteers: Pam Little to lead, Carlos Gutierrez, Michele Neylon)
- Small team to provide proposed approach to GNSO Council
- ICANN staff to add CCT-RT to the August Council meeting agenda planning document
- Councilors to review draft text and provide input, if applicable, prior to the September 2019 Council meeting, 13 September 2019 at the latest.
Pam Little Carlos Raul Gutierrez Michele Neylon
EPDP Phase 2 Work plan package
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Councilors to review EPDP Phase 2 work plan package and share any comments or questions with the mailing list
k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak
Marika Konings Steve Chan Berry Cobb
Request for Clarification on Data Accuracy and Phase-2 of the Expedited Policy Development Process (EPDP) on the Temporary Specification for gTLD Registration Data
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Council leadership to draft response to ICANN org, acknowledging receipt of the letter, acknowledgment of the underlying issue, and committing to determine next steps as a Council.
- ICANN staff to include an agenda item on the September Council meeting, inviting ICANN Org to speak on the impact of GDPR as well as the EPDP 1 recommendations on the enforcement and implementation of existing policies, procedures, and contractual provisions related to accuracy (including ARS).
- Council to convene a small group to draft a substantive response on data accuracy for Council review to send to ICANN Org in response to 21 June letter (https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/marby-to-drazek-21jun19-en.pdf) (volunteers: Marie, Darcy, Flip)
Rafik Dammak k drazek Pam Little
EPDP phase 1 recommendations Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Council to, in consultation with the EPDP team, write communication to ICANN Board and seek to secure board support for Rec #12.
- Council to consider if they would like to provide a written response to ICANN Org, to be delivered by the end of September. Councilors to inform their respective SG/Cs of the timeline for providing input.
CCT-RT recommendations
Status colour Blue title IN PROGRESS
- Council to convene small team to consider CCT-RT recommendations referred to the GNSO and GNSO PDPs and determine next steps (Volunteers: Pam Little to lead, Carlos Gutierrez, Michele Neylon)
- Small team to provide proposed approach to GNSO Council
- ICANN staff to add CCT-RT to the August Council meeting agenda planning document
- Councilors to review draft text and provide input, if applicable, prior to the September 2019 Council meeting, 13 September 2019 at the latest.
- Councilors to work to complete the letter, which may include integrating elements such as: When the letter references that some Councilors having dissenting views, that the group holding those dissenting views are identified. Add clarity about the ask of the ICANN Board (e.g., confirm that the Board and Council have a common understanding).
- Rafik Dammak to confirm when recommendation one, purpose 2 will be expected to be discussed by the EPDP phase 2
k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak
Marika Konings Nathalie PeregrineQuestions from the RPM PDP Working Group Co-Chairs
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- Councilors to review Council leadership response to RPM leadership (see https://gnso.icann.org/en/correspondence/gnso-council-to-rpm-pdp-co-chairs-22aug19-en.pdf) and advise Council leadership of any questions, comments or concerns in relation to the response.
ICANN66 Draft Schedule
Status colour Green title COMPLETED
- ICANN Staff to send travel reminders to councilors
...