Page History
...
Item number | Board Rating | NCSG view | Comment | |||||
1 | 1B | Support | Rec6 indicates strong support for calling these issues: Principles of International Law. NCSG supports this name for the issue. | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
2.1.1 | 1B | Support |
| |||||
2.1.2 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
2.1.3 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
2.2.1 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
2.2.2 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
2.2.3 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
2.2.4 | 1B | Support | recommends the wording "material detriment to the targeted community." | |||||
2.2.5 | 1B | Support |
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
3.1.1 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
3.1.2 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
3.2 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
3.3 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
3.4 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
3.5 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
3.6 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
3.7 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
4.1 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
4.2 | 1B | 2 | Goes beyond the role of the ICANN to seek data on the application process itself. | |||||
4.3 | 1A | Support | Caution that this process might be at the cost of innovation | |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
5 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
6.1.1 | 1B | 2 | The NCSG points out that this goes back to scope defined in the IRT, which was rejected by the STI. The GAC request as well as the Board response are unclear as to the scope of Intellectual Property and taken literally this would too broad. | |||||
6.1.2 | 2 | Support | The GAC postion runs against the recommendations of the the GNSO, the IRT and the STI. | |||||
6.1.3 | 2 | Support | It is impossible to set objective and fair criteria for such determinations. | |||||
6.1.4 | 1B | Support | The NCSG understands both sides of this issues and shares the same concerns as the Board - trademark owners grabbing easy trademarks and gaming the system. A mechanism to address this issue is needed. | |||||
6.1.5 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
6.1.6 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
6.1.7.1 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
6.1.7.2 | 1B | Support |
| |||||
6.2.1 | 1A | Need more information | We would like to know which timeframes are being referred to. The NCSG has a concern about any timeframe in which the respondent has less time to respond. | |||||
6.2.2 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
6.2.3 | 1A | 2 | The NCSG supports the recommendation made in the STI process: the respondent should be given the right to participate in selecting a panel. | |||||
6.2.4 | 1B | Support |
| |||||
6.2.5 | 1B | 2 | This equates default with a presumption of guilt. | |||||
6.2.6 | 2 | Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2.7 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
6.2.8 | 2 | Support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6.2.9 | 2 | Support |
|
|
| |||
6.2.10.1 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
6.2.10.2 | 2 | Support |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
6.2.10.3 | 1A | 2 | This equates default with a presumption of guilt. | |||||
6.2.11 | 1B | Support |
| |||||
6.2.12 | 1B | Support |
| |||||
6.2.13 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
6.3.1 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
6.3.2 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
6.3.3 | 1B | Support |
| |||||
6.3.4 | ? |
|
| |||||
6.3.5 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
6.3.6 | 2 | Support |
| |||||
6.3.7 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
6.4.1 | 1B | Support |
| |||||
6.4.2 | 1B | Support |
| |||||
6.4.3 | 1A | Support |
| |||||
6.4.4 | 2 | Support |
|
|
|
| ||
|
|
|
| |||||
7.1 | 1B |
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
| |||||
|
|
|
|
...
