Versions Compared

Key

  • This line was added.
  • This line was removed.
  • Formatting was changed.

...

EPDP phase 1 recommendationsCouncil leadership and staff to schedule an extraordinary Council meeting to discuss the Board adoption of the EPDP policy recommendations.
  •  Staff to provide Board voting results
  •  Council leadership to prepare an action plan for engaging with the Board. This includes documenting the options available to the Council, collecting questions/comments/concerns from Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies and the EPDP Team, timeline for engagement with the EPDP Team, and timeline for engagement with the Board.

k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak

Marika Konings Nathalie Peregrine

Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance16 May Staff to investigate the anticipated timing, funding and expected deliverables for the Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance project.

Rafik Dammak Pam Little k drazek

Marika Konings Steve Chan

GNSO Input to the Independent Review Process Standing Panel16 May Councilors to reach out to their respective groups to communicate additional call for volunteers for additional members to serve on the IRP Implementation Oversight Team.

k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak

Marika Konings

RPM Charter amendments16 May Staff to circulate call for volunteers for Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs Phase 2 charter amendments.

Mary Wong Julie Hedlund Ariel Liang

Managing IDN Variants TLDs18 Apr Small group of Councilors to convene and then coordinate with ICANN to get further understanding, and potentially propose next steps for IDN TLD Variants.
  •  Staff to develop options paper to support small group efforts

Rubens Kuhl k drazek Pam Little Rafik Dammak

Steve Chan

CSC Effectiveness Review Final ReportIn accordance with terms of the CSC Effectiveness Review Template, the Chair of GNSO Council and the Chair of ccNSO Council are requested to recommend report to IANA Naming Function Review Team (IFRT) as soon as that is established.
  •  The GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Secretariat to share the results of this motion with the CSC. 

k drazek Pam Little Rafik DammakPhilippe Fouquart

Marika Konings Steve Chan

Comments ICANN’s 2021-2025 Strat Plan, FY20 Operating Plan and Budget: common concerns

Topic

Entry Date (E)

____________

Target Date (T)

Action Item

Responsible Council Member

____

Responsible Staff member


Info

Additional Notes


Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

 

  •  
  • Staff to investigate the anticipated timing, funding and expected deliverables for the Evolution of the Multi stakeholder Model of Governance project.

RPM Charter amendments

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

 

  •  Staff to circulate call for volunteers for Review of All Rights Protection Mechanisms in All gTLDs Phase 2 charter amendments.

Mary Wong Julie Hedlund Ariel Liang


Legislative Tracker

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

 

  •  
  • Small group of Councilors to develop draft message to ICANN Org to provide input on legislative tracker. Based on feedback, Council leadership to consider scheduling follow up discussion at ICANN65. 
  •  Global Engagement to take into account feedback, in particular, inclusion of rationale for including a piece of legislation on the legal / regulatory tracker.

CSC Effectiveness Review Final Report

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

 

  •  
  • In accordance with terms of the CSC Effectiveness Review Template, the Chair of GNSO Council and the Chair of ccNSO Council are requested to recommend report to IANA Naming Function Review Team (IFRT) as soon as that is established.
  •  The GNSO Council instructs the GNSO Secretariat to share the results of this motion with the CSC. 

Comments ICANN’s 2021-2025 Strat Plan, FY20 Operating Plan and Budget: common concerns

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS


 

  •  
  • SCBO to do analysis between ccNSO/GNSO comments, identify elements for common cause. Look at how the reserve fund replenishment can be sustained.
  •  Materials to compare CCNSO & GNSO comments on 5YSP were sent to SCBO on 1 June. It included a recently revised draft of the strategy document released by Org that included a comparison of the drafts. 

PDP update: discussion of SubPro progress

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS


 

  •  
  • Council leadership to propose path forward to obtain clarification / provide view concerning intersection between the Name Collisions Analysis Project and SubPro PDP

IFR team

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

 

  •  
Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

 

  • Once the Council receives the receipt for IFR membership confirmation, Council to consider how best to coordinate co-chair selection with ccNSO, which will be responsible for selecting the ccNSO co-chair.
  •  Council to consider selection process by which a GNSO appointed member of the IANA Function Review (IFR) team will be selected to serve as the GNSO co-chair on the IFR as the ICANN Bylaws stipulate that “(d) The IFRT shall be led by two co-chairs: one appointed by the GNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (c)-(f) of Section 18.7 and one appointed by the ccNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (a)-(b) of Section 18.7” once the IFR membership has been confirmed.
  •  IANA Function Review (IFR) Team composition: Review of the ccNSO proposal to manage deficiencies - Councilors to take discussion on ccNSO proposal (here: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/council/2019-January/022175.html) to their respective SG/C and to then consider what input they would like to provide.

Drafting Team on charter related to the next steps for the ICANN Procedure of Handling Whois conflicts with Privacy

  •  SCBO to do analysis between ccNSO/GNSO comments, identify elements for common cause. Look at how the reserve fund replenishment can be sustained.
  •  Materials to compare CCNSO & GNSO comments on 5YSP were sent to SCBO on 1 June. It included a recently revised draft of the strategy document released by Org that included a comparison of the drafts. 
Ayden Férdeline k drazekPam LittleRafik DammakBerry Cobb Marika KoningsSteve Chan

PDP update: discussion of SubPro progress

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

 

  •  Council leadership to propose path forward to obtain clarification / provide view concerning intersection between the Name Collisions Analysis Project and SubPro PDP

Rafik Dammak Pam Little k drazek

Marika Konings Steve Chan

IFR team

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

16 Aug


 


 

  •  
Once the Council receives the receipt for IFR membership confirmation, Council to consider how best to coordinate co-chair selection with ccNSO, which will be responsible for selecting the ccNSO co-chair.
  • GNSO Council, after having considered the 1 August letter from Akram Atallah and receiving a brief update from GDD on its 24 August Council meeting, should determine next steps for reviewing the Whois Procedure.
  •  Drafting team members to share draft charter and identified questions in charter with respective SG/Cs for feedback, following which the drafting team will review this input and finalize the charter for GNSO Council consideration.
  •  Council to consider adoption of charter at its upcoming meeting
  •  Call for volunteers to be delayed at least until the EPDP hits the milestone of publishing its Initial Report. Council to discuss this topic once that milestone is hit.
  •  ICANN Staff to circulate a call for volunteers (subsequent to the initiation and chartering process for the EPDP on the Temporary Specification) to the GNSO Stakeholder Groups, with the request for each Stakeholder Group to appoint up to 3 members to the Implementation Advisory Group (IAG). The call for volunteers should also be more widely circulated to seek volunteers to serve as participants and observers to the IAG.
  •  Council leadership to research and develop guidance for if and when the work on the ICANN Procedure of Handling Whois conflicts with Privacy should begin.

Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status Report

  •  Council to consider selection process by which a GNSO appointed member of the IANA Function Review (IFR) team will be selected to serve as the GNSO co-chair on the IFR as the ICANN Bylaws stipulate that “(d) The IFRT shall be led by two co-chairs: one appointed by the GNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (c)-(f) of Section 18.7 and one appointed by the ccNSO from one of the members appointed pursuant to clauses (a)-(b) of Section 18.7” once the IFR membership has been confirmed.
Drafting Team on charter related to the next steps for the ICANN Procedure of Handling Whois conflicts with Privacy

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

 


 

  •  
GNSO Council, after having considered the 1 August letter from Akram Atallah and receiving a brief update from GDD on its 24 August Council meeting, should determine next steps for reviewing the Whois Procedure.
  •  Drafting team members to share draft charter and identified questions in charter with respective SG/Cs for feedback, following which the drafting team will review this input and finalize the charter for GNSO Council consideration.
  •  Council to consider adoption of charter at its upcoming meeting
  •  Call for volunteers to be delayed at least until the EPDP hits the milestone of publishing its Initial Report. Council to discuss this topic once that milestone is hit.
  •  ICANN Staff to circulate a call for volunteers (subsequent to the initiation and chartering process for the EPDP on the Temporary Specification) to the GNSO Stakeholder Groups, with the request for each Stakeholder Group to appoint up to 3 members to the Implementation Advisory Group (IAG). The call for volunteers should also be more widely circulated to seek volunteers to serve as participants and observers to the IAG.
  • Council to further consider next steps in relation to the review of the Transfer Policy which would result in providing GDD information/response on expected next steps and/or seek additional information as the Council considers how to approach the Transfer Policy review, for example, holistically instead of piecemeal.
  •  Rubens Kuhl, as Council liaison, to reach out to the IRT for the EPDP Phase 1 to have a conversation and gain a better understanding of how to address recommendation 24 and the Form of Authorization issue stemming from the Temporary Specification.
  •  Council to determine next steps for the Transfer Policy, which could include the chartering of a narrowly focused EPDP

GNSO Input to the Independent Review Process Standing Panel

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

 

  •  Councilors to reach out to their respective groups to communicate additional call for volunteers for additional members to serve on the IRP Implementation Oversight Team.

Marika Konings




Managing IDN Variants TLDs

  •  Council leadership to research and develop guidance for if and when the work on the ICANN Procedure of Handling Whois conflicts with Privacy should begin.

Michele Neylon Paul McGrady k drazek Stephanie Perrin Pam Little

Marika Konings Nathalie Peregrine

Legislative Tracker

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

10 Mar

 

  •  Small group of Councilors to
develop draft message to ICANN Org to provide input on legislative tracker. Based on feedback, Council leadership to consider scheduling follow up discussion at ICANN65. 
  •  Global Engagement to take into account feedback, in particular, inclusion of rationale for including a piece of legislation on the legal / regulatory tracker.
  • convene and then coordinate with ICANN to get further understanding, and potentially propose next steps for IDN TLD Variants.
  •  Staff to develop options paper to support small group efforts

Steve Chan


Pam Little k drazek Rafik Dammak

Marika Konings Mandy Carver

Inter-Registrar Transfer Policy (IRTP) Policy Status ReportEPDP phase 1 recommendations

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

13 Mar  

  •  Council to further consider next steps in relation to the review of the Transfer Policy which would result in providing GDD information/response on expected next steps and/or seek additional information as the Council considers how to approach the Transfer Policy review, for example, holistically instead of piecemeal.
  •  Rubens Kuhl, as Council liaison, to reach out to the IRT for the EPDP Phase 1 to have a conversation and gain a better understanding of how to address recommendation 24 and the Form of Authorization issue stemming from the Temporary Specification.
  •  Council to determine next steps for the Transfer Policy, which could include the chartering of a narrowly focused EPDP
  •  Council leadership and staff to schedule an extraordinary Council meeting to discuss the Board adoption of the EPDP policy recommendations.
  •  Staff to provide Board voting results
  •  Council leadership to prepare an action plan for engaging with the Board. This includes documenting the options available to the Council, collecting questions/comments/concerns from Stakeholder Groups/Constituencies and the EPDP Team, timeline for engagement with the EPDP Team, and timeline for engagement with the Board.

Marika Konings

Steve Chan

 Nathalie Peregrine


IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms

Status
colourBlue
titleIN PROGRESS

 


  •  Susan Kawaguchi to collaborate with the PDP WG and staff to develop a draft final report for preliminary consideration by the GNSO Council (targeting May meeting).
  •  Susan Kawaguchi and Heather Forrest to prepare report on the usage of the 3.7 Appeal Process contained in the GNSO Operating Procedure that is intended to capture the process used and lessons learned.
  •  ICANN staff to inform the IGO-INGO CRP PDP WG that the GNSO Council resolved that the Working Group, in line with the Council’s priority to ensure responsible allocation of resources and timely management of the PDP, the Final Report be submitted in time to meet the July 2018 GNSO Council meeting document deadline.
  •  Councilors to review Final Report, especially in the broader context of the appropriate overall scope of protection for all IGO identifiers, in preparation for consideration as early as the August Council meeting.
  •  ICANN staff to inform the ICANN Board and the GAC that the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Mechanisms PDP Working Group has completed its work and forward a copy of the Final Report to them
  •  Councilors to review Final Report and options flowchart, then prepare a list of questions by 31 August 2018 that they have, for response by the WG leadership, WG liaison, WG members, or staff as appropriate.
  •  ICANN staff to work with the GNSO Chair and Council liaison to determine possible ways to address concerns regarding some of the PDP recommendations within the scope of the PDP Manual, in light of the fact that the WG has not identified any recommendations as being interdependent.
  •  Next steps for the IGO-INGO Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms PDP WG Final Report - ICANN staff to schedule webinar for questions and answers
  •  Council leadership/staff to develop a summary document to capture concerns and issues with the PDP, as well as next step options available to the Council
  •  Council leadership to again present Council  options for the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Final Report to consider and discuss with their respective SG/Cs.
  •  Council leadership and Council to continue developing proposed path forward for the Working Group’s Final Report.
  •  Councilors to review the materials for the webinar held on 09 October 2019 (available here: https://gnso.icann.org/en/group-activities/calendar/2018#oct) and other materials shared for the agenda item (here: https://community.icann.org/x/JIoWBg)
  •  Council Leadership to consider repurposing the extraordinary meeting on 14 February 2019 to discuss IGO/INGO Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms if the EPDP Final Report is not yet available for discussion and review.
  •  Council leadership to develop a new options document to include proposed motion language for each option for Council consideration.
  •  Council leadership to follow up on existing action item regarding expected report from Heather Forrest and Susan Kawaguchi on process management for the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms.
  •  GNSO Chair to prepare communication to GAC/IGOs to explain rationale for vote and demonstrate how they will be able to participate.
  •  Staff to communicate the IGO-INGO Access to Curative Rights Protection Mechanisms PDP Recommendations Report to ICANN Board Operations.
  •  Keith Drazek to prepare draft response to the GAC and circulate to the Council list. Upon agreement from the Council, Staff to facilitate sending the finalized response to the GAC prior to the close of business on 31 May 2019.
  •  Council leadership to include discussion of recommendations 1-4 into agenda for meeting with the Board at ICANN65.

Non-registry GNSO Liaison to the Customer Standing Committee

Status
colourGreen
titleCOMPLETED

 

  •  Council to determine their approach for the non-registry GNSO liaison to the Customer Standing Committee (CSC), which could include supporting James Gannon to serve a second term or to seek additional candidates.

Marika Konings


CCWG on New gTLD Auction Proceeds

Status
colourGreen
titleCOMPLETED

 

  •  Staff to inform CCWG on New gTLD Auction Proceeds of the confirmation of Julf Helsingius to serve on the working group
Nathalie Peregrine

...