Page History
...
Tip | ||
---|---|---|
| ||
Apologies: Maxim Alzoba, Petter Rindforth, Zak Muscovitch, Kristine Dorrain |
Note |
---|
Notes/ Action Items Action Items:
Brief Notes:
2. Development of Preliminary Recommendations: a. Discuss agreed Sunrise Charter Question 8 -- There were some limited comments in the data, but don’t think they relate to the LRP. Some issues around launch programs generally. -- Limited uptake of ALP. -- People need to be clear what they are talking about. Make sure this is clear in the discussion thread. -- The responses said that some registries noted issues with the improved launch program, which is completely different. -- Staff will revise the summary table by reviewing the source material. b. Discuss agreed Sunrise Charter Question 9, in conjunction with Proposal #13 -- Support for keeping the current rules. -- Let mark holders decide where to register the mark in Sunrise. -- Anecdote suggest problems -- scenarios where people gamed the system. -- Solution penalizes the vast majority of genuine brand owners. -- Don’t develop a system that goes further than it should. -- Not every TLD is category-specific. Proposal #13, Michael Karanicolas: -- Where a top level domain is suggestive of a category of service, then the TM holder would have to prove use in that category of service. -- The proposal doesn’t go far enough. -- Could look at how SDRP could address the problem or some variant |