Page History

PROPOSED AGENDA

1. Review agenda/updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs)
2. Development of Preliminary Recommendations:
1. Discuss individual proposals relating to questions 2 and 3 (see individual proposals at: https://community.icann.org/x/R6EWBg)

                                                    i.     Question 2: individual proposals #1 and #12

                                                   ii.     Question 3: individual proposal #1

1. Begin discussion of preliminary recommendations for question 4
1. AOB

NOTE: If any Sub Team member knows they will miss the 10 April meeting could they please consider emailing any suggested preliminary recommendations to the Sub Team list.  Note also the following homework from the last meeting:

1. Sub Team members should review the questions, beginning with Question 4 (see attached summary table) and suggest preliminary recommendations.
2. Sub Team members should review individual proposals: See https://community.icann.org/x/R6EWBg (bottom half of the table on the wiki page includes the Trademark Claims related individual proposals)
3. Staff will draft language for preliminary recommendations for which proposals have been discussed (1, 3(a) and (b)).

 BACKGROUND DOCUMENTS

Claims Summary Table] (8 March 2019).pdf

Mp3

AC recording

GNSO transcripts are located on the GNSO Calendar

Attendance & AC chat

Apologies:

Notes/ Action Items

Actions:

1. Staff, as a continuation of the action item from the 03 April call, will continue to compile into the summary table draft language for preliminary recommendations as suggested in the Sub Team discussions.  Staff will initiate email threads on charter questions under discussion and associated draft preliminary recommendations for Sub Team members to review and discuss.
2. Sub Team members: Complete the homework (see separate [HOMEWORK] email) in preparation for the next meeting:
1. Reviewing Agreed TM Claims Charter Question 2, in conjunction with Individual Proposals #1 and #12;
2. Reviewing Agreed TM Claims Charter Question 1, in conjunction with Individual Proposals #5 and #6.

Notes:

1. Updates to Statements of Interest (SOIs): No updates provided.

1. Development of Preliminary Recommendations:
2. Discuss individual proposals relating to questions 2 and 3 (see individual proposals at: https://community.icann.org/x/R6EWBg)

Question 2: individual proposals #1 and #12

Individual Proposal #1:

-- Sub Team members noting that they are not in favor of the proposal.

-- Focus attention on things we have identified to improve.

-- No evidence that the bad effects of RPMs outweigh the benefits.

-- Registries/Registrars comments on eliminating or shortening the claims doesn't seem to have an effect on cybersquatting.

Individual Proposal #12:

-- We don't know the effects that the current period is having.  Don't know that we have evidence to justify extending it.

-- Support for the proposal -- intertwined with improving the TM Claims notice.  If the does what we'd like it to do then it provides a service for the applicants and TM holder.  If we have a valid claims statement then this is a rational suggestion.

-- Think we have talked about this.

-- Value to put this as a question for comment.

-- Could compile a list of data we think should be collected for future review.

-- Thought there was agreement to put the proposal out for comment.