Thick Whois IRT - AC Room - 13 Sept 2016

  Chris Pelling: (9/13/2016 20:58) evening all
  Dennis Chang: (20:59) greetings
  Dennis Chang: (20:59) welcome IRT
  Marc Anderson: (21:01) yes, I can hear you
  steve metalitz: (21:09) Could someone summarize the objection to the definition originally proposed?
  Alan Greenberg: (21:10) Agree. Point to not list.
  Theo Geurts: (21:19) Chris Peling lost connection, can you let him back in Dennis?
  Chris Pelling: (21:20) Im back
  Chris Pelling: (21:20) I am here
  Chris Pelling: (21:20) I am just listening
  Chris Pelling: (21:20) thanks :)
  Chris Pelling: (21:20) fat fingers killed the session :/
  Roger Carney: (21:23) +! Francisco
  Theo Geurts: (21:23) agreed
  Jody Kolker: (21:24) agree also.
  Jody Kolker: (21:24) need it for section 2.5 also.
  steve metalitz: (21:41) Could someone clarify what particular provision in the draft registrars are objecting to?  
  Francisco Arias: (21:42) 2.10 in the last draft circulated
  Francisco Arias: (21:42) which would become 2.9 (as shown by Dennis in the AC room) after removing 2.6
  Alan Greenberg 2: (21:43) Krista, where are we suggesting that some do not need to be thick?
  Krista Papac: (21:45) @Alan: I believe that is what is being said, however I may be mishearing - hence, my clarifying question.
  steve metalitz: (21:46) Where does 2.9 (formerly 2.10) require registrars to clean up/supply missing data?  I don
  Francisco Arias: (21:47) the aforementioned section allows the registry to not show contact data up to before 1 Feb 2019
  steve metalitz: (21:47) +1 that registrars have to be complying now.  
  Francisco Arias: (21:47) the allowance would finish on 1 Feb 2019 as written
  Francisco Arias: (21:47) meaning full thick Whois data from 1 Feb 2019 for all gTLD registrations
  Chris Pelling: (21:49) What we cannot do is both the correction of incomplete/missing data and this migration at the same time
  Rob Golding: (21:49) *agrred* - _if_ data is misisng and becomes an "issue" for someone, there are already processes to report/check/update it
  Chris Pelling: (21:50) yes Krista, this being after the transition
  Roger Carney: (21:55) +1 Theo
  Chris Pelling: (21:55) Owen is here though
  Chris Pelling: (22:00) ok , thanks.