00:07:05 Anil Kumar Jain: Hello all 00:07:45 Pitinan Kooarmornpatana - ICANN Org: Thank you, Bart 00:07:52 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: To submit your ccNSO SOI: https://forms.gle/2hbYWyeu2Jf4LKR78 00:33:22 Jiankang: I read the document written by Pitinan. I tend to agree with the points raised by Pitinan 00:33:49 Jiankang: Q4: What changes needed in the report, to make the policy consistent with the IDN EPDP? A4: There will be two main updates: • Section 7.2.3.a., add “It is proposed that the Similarity Evaluation Panel should determine which additional variants of the basic set of strings should be included in the Request Side,…” • The result of SEP must apply for all labels in the set, and therefore, section 8.6.4.3.a, 8.6.4.3.b, and 8.6.4.3.c needs to be revised. It is p 00:55:07 Jiankang: a1, a2, a3,….. are variants. B1, b2, b3 are variants. A1 and b1 are visual similar. A1 and b2 are not visual similar. So the a1 and b2 may be delegated by the current policy. But some users will misunderstand a1 as b1 and go to b2. (B1 is blocked due to similarity between a1 and b1) 00:55:27 Jiankang: I try to summarise it as above. 00:56:49 Jiankang: A little complex 01:00:33 Michael Bauland: yes 01:02:17 Hadia’s iPhone: The conservative approach is an SSAC recommendation 01:03:42 Jeffrey Bedser: Reacted to "The conservative app..." with 👍 01:03:52 Hadia’s iPhone: Okay makes sense 01:06:08 Jeffrey Bedser: Apologies I must drop for another call. 01:10:57 Irina Danelia: Apologies, I have to drop. Happy holidays all! 01:13:36 Patricio Poblete: Sorry to join (very) late, I had a conflicting meeting. 01:17:45 Anna Karakhanyan: Hello! Sorry I had a problem with Internet connection… 01:23:45 Peter Koch: The graphic suggests the same(!) panel would apply the union(?) of available policies, which is the IDNccTLD policy only once the next round will have been closed? 01:25:11 Hadia’s iPhone: The outcome of the comparison could differ if we are not during a gTLD round - this is how I understand it 01:25:12 Peter Koch: My understanding would be that the candidate gTLD would be evaluated against the EPDP(gTLD) policy and the IDN ccTLD against our output 01:27:07 Anil Kumar Jain: I still feel that inconsistency as talked about may not be there 01:42:36 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: Happy Holidays, thank you bye 01:42:41 Pitinan Kooarmornpatana - ICANN Org: Thank you happy holidays :) 01:42:44 Michael Bauland: thanks, happy holidays 01:42:49 Hadia’s iPhone: Bye all