00:12:23 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: Saturday, 21 October - blocks 1 and 2 00:16:38 Stephen Deerhake - .as ccNSO Councillor: Updates during the session? I did I hear that correctly? 00:17:24 Stephen Deerhake - .as ccNSO Councillor: This will be interesting... 00:20:18 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: @Pablo Rodriguez - we will ask for additional resources for notes 00:25:43 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: Down we all want to be butterflies ;) 00:25:52 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: not 00:39:53 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: They are interconnected 00:48:33 David McAuley (Verisign): 'Free Ice Cream' CI 00:51:46 Alejandra Reynoso: David, should it be a question? "Is the ccNSO at risk?" 00:52:14 David McAuley (Verisign): No, I would make it declarative Alejandra - consistent with graph 00:52:37 Alejandra Reynoso: ok 00:53:14 Pablo Rodriguez: Improving is a choice! 00:57:02 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: I like the idea of the graph as well - as Sean says - picture says a thousand words 00:59:34 David McAuley (Verisign): I think Segun is right about the information but I also think people won't read it. IMO we need to stick to one page. 00:59:35 Stephen Deerhake - .as ccNSO Councillor: OK! I surrender. I presume the 2nd document's circulation is limited to those who have taken the bait and agreed to participate? 01:00:10 Alejandra Reynoso: Or for those who are curious enough Stephen ;) 01:00:35 David McAuley (Verisign): send more info to RSVPs and have hand outs for those who just show up - is that ok 01:02:34 David McAuley (Verisign): I plan to be there but have one hard to manage issue - difficulty hearing is often a challenge in breakout settings 01:07:32 Sabrina Wilkinson (CIRA): Hey folks! Sorry, have to head out to daycare pick-up shortly. I added a few proposed questions in the comment section of the invitation. I'll also add them here: 1. How can we ensure that participation in the ccNSO reflects the widest range of voices as possible? 2. Where are there inefficiencies in how the ccNSO operates? 01:08:01 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: Alejandra wondered if it should be phrased as a question 01:08:07 Joke Braeken - ICANN org (ccNSO): My suggestion: is the ccNSO future-proof? 01:08:30 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: ccNSO is at risk without continuous improvement 01:09:11 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: Alejandra: Is the ccNSO at risk… 01:10:56 Stephen Deerhake - .as ccNSO Councillor: +1 @David. Declarative statement is the way to go. 01:11:30 David McAuley (Verisign): whichever is likelier to promotie discussion 01:11:38 David McAuley (Verisign): promote 01:13:04 David McAuley (Verisign): i agree w Alejandra 01:13:05 Pablo Rodriguez: I have no objection 01:14:16 Pablo Rodriguez: I prefer at risks 01:14:51 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: ccNSO collapses without continuous improvement. ccNSO is at risk without continuous improvement Is the ccNSO at risk without continuous improvement? 01:14:52 Irina Danelia, ccNSO Council: at risk 01:15:25 David McAuley (Verisign): well said by Pablo 01:15:28 Irina Danelia, ccNSO Council: Is the ccNSO at risk without continuous improvement? 01:15:57 Pablo Rodriguez: Statement 01:16:07 Irina Danelia, ccNSO Council: question 01:16:10 David McAuley (Verisign): That will be the discussion, Irina - ATRT3 folks seemed to suspect maybe so 01:20:49 Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org: Good suggestion, thank you Segun 01:21:06 Pablo Rodriguez: Good catch Segun 01:21:25 David McAuley (Verisign): not here 01:22:19 Stephen Deerhake - .as ccNSO Councillor: At the call of the chair 01:22:50 Joke Braeken - ICANN org (ccNSO): Bye all