00:17:45	Hadia ElMiniawi:	Hello all
00:30:38	Jaap Akkerhuis:	If you are unfamiliar you have a higher risk of being a victim of a homonym attack
00:32:12	Hadia ElMiniawi:	Thank you
00:34:41	Hadia ElMiniawi:	+1 Bart agree and how you implement the policy here is crucial
00:43:06	Sarmad Hussain - ICANN Org:	https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/idn-variant-tld-recommendations-analysis-25jan19-en.pdf
00:43:24	Sarmad Hussain - ICANN Org:	pg. 19
00:44:29	Sarmad Hussain - ICANN Org:	Similarly, if a string is blocked under the RZ-LGR, but a visually
similar string is allocatable, then the second (visually similar) string might become a “work
around” for the blocked string. T
00:53:59	Hadia ElMiniawi:	But in the EPDP we are not looking at full three level comparison
00:58:15	Hadia ElMiniawi:	blocked is not compared with blocked
01:01:44	Sarmad Hussain - ICANN Org:	An example:
01:02:18	Sarmad Hussain - ICANN Org:	bill —>  bıll (blocked) (dotless i)

A different string confusing similar to bıll can proceed if blocked are not compared.
01:02:29	Lu ai-chin:	if someone applies a string which is similar with the blocked variant it possible happen in the different script/language
01:04:18	Jiankang Yao:	sarmard，comparation to blocked one is better?
01:05:04	Jiankang Yao:	Based on sarmard ‘s example
01:05:21	Sarmad Hussain - ICANN Org:	Tool not used as it is not used
01:05:32	Sarmad Hussain - ICANN Org:	Tool is not accurate
01:05:38	Sarmad Hussain - ICANN Org:	Done manually
01:07:46	Hadia ElMiniawi:	if we consider scaling and manual comparison then comparing with blocked variants is not something doable
01:08:47	Hadia ElMiniawi:	+1 to revisiting the issue in two weeks
01:16:25	Hadia ElMiniawi:	I read it
01:19:03	Hadia ElMiniawi:	ok sure
01:31:37	Kimberly Carlson - ICANN Org:	19th July, 13:00 UTC
01:33:24	Hadia ElMiniawi:	Thank you and bye for today
01:33:31	Svitlana Tkachenko:	thank you!
01:33:35	Jaap Akkerhuis:	bye