00:24:34 Kimberly Carlson: 14 or 22 00:26:16 hadia Elminiawi: anil we cannot hear you 00:28:48 Dennis Tan: Makes sense. Agreed 00:28:51 hadia Elminiawi: agree 00:29:19 Kimberly Carlson: DES and VM meet at 14:00 UTC, full group meets at 13:00 UTC 00:36:17 hadia Elminiawi: this is a new hand 00:39:02 Dennis Tan: Application sequence may yield different set of “allocatable” labels 00:39:54 Bart Boswinkel: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/string-evaluation-completion-2014-02-19-en 00:43:09 Dennis Tan: How would the applicant know this, though? It would require prior knowledge that the set of allocatable labels depends on the primary label. I think the applicant should be made be aware of this particularity. 00:44:50 hadia Elminiawi: +1 Dennis 00:47:52 hadia Elminiawi: now I am confused 00:49:45 Dennis Tan: Case 1: applied-for variant not calculated by RZ-LGR —> what is the outcome? policy could say: sorry, not valid per RZ-LGR as variant, but may be delegated if not already allocated to other operator. 00:56:51 hadia Elminiawi: Saudi Arabia, Syria, Iran, Pakistan, Macao China 01:01:12 hadia Elminiawi: so either it is a general policy or not 01:01:46 Dennis Tan: There are a few of these strings (desired variants), so could we know whether they are variants or not of the original label per the latest version of the RZ-LGR? perhaps we are discussing theoretical problem that may not exist 01:02:20 Lu ai-chin: when we applied the IDN ccTLD under fast track process, we summit the IDN variant table, and the desired variant string come from the IDN variant table. 01:03:47 hadia Elminiawi: @Dennis I think what Sarmad was saying that this is a existing situation and not a theoretical one (not sure though) 01:04:19 hadia Elminiawi: is that this is an existing 01:05:21 Dennis Tan: Okay, thanks Hadia 01:06:29 Pitinan Kooarmornpatana: In respond to Dennis question. The self-identified variant labels of existing ccTLDs not covered by the RZ-LGR calculation is Syria. 01:06:59 Dennis Tan: Thank you Pitinan 01:10:41 hadia Elminiawi: @bart I understand that this is limited to the RZ-LGR 01:10:43 hadia Elminiawi: agree 01:11:42 hadia Elminiawi: it is in consistent 01:12:04 Anil Kumar Jain, NIXI India: +1 01:12:59 Dennis Tan: RZ-LGR and IDN ccTLD string eligibility criteria, collectively, are paramount. 01:13:49 hadia Elminiawi: +1 it is an exception to per language per script combination 01:20:27 Dennis Tan: Apologies but I need to drop for another call. Good discussion today. Thank you 01:23:58 Michael Bauland: I'm fine with continuing a few more minutes 01:38:08 Anil Kumar Jain, NIXI India: They are challenging the process not content 01:41:33 hadia Elminiawi: coreect 01:43:33 hadia Elminiawi: correct 01:49:17 Anil Kumar Jain, NIXI India: I agree with 1300 UTC 01:50:00 hadia Elminiawi: thank you all - bye 01:50:00 Anil Kumar Jain, NIXI India: Bye 01:50:18 Kimberly Carlson: REMINDER: Full Group call on the 6th 01:50:22 Michael Bauland: bye 01:50:22 Kimberly Carlson: Bye all, thank you 01:50:26 Pitinan Kooarmornpatana: Thank you all