00:16:42 Kimberly Carlson: Hello and welcome to today’s GRC 2.0 teleconference. Attendance will be taken based on Zoom. One apology from Atsushi (SG). 00:19:28 Joke Braeken: Poll: Which option do you prefer? Option 1: 29% Option 3: 65% None of the above: 6% No opinion: 0% 00:19:54 Svitlana Tkachenko: Do you mean option 3? 00:20:15 Kimberly Carlson: Poll screen shot is on the screen 00:20:45 Stephen Deerhake: Looks good. 00:23:45 Katrina Sataki: Is it a requirement or a possibility (for the ccNSO to choose who is on the Board)? 00:26:21 Irina Danelia: My main point is that the wording of the Rules should not leave possibility for 2-way interpretation. So whatever is decided, it should be crystal clear from the text 00:28:40 Irina Danelia: My second point is that after the Rules are approved, the Guidelines must be reviewed to make sure they all are consistent with the Rules 00:29:30 Alejandra Reynoso .gt - ccNSO Council: Fair points Irina, I agree. 00:31:07 Sean Copeland: Should elections not have just a min participation vs quorum. Elections are not the same thing as passing or or not passing guidelines or rules etc 00:32:29 Irina Danelia: +1 Bart 00:33:25 Katrina Sataki: I agree with Sean’s point 00:36:58 David McAuley (Verisign): Thank you, Sean 00:38:06 Stephen Deerhake .as (ccNSO Council): Do it like the way David ha run it. 00:39:11 Stephen Deerhake .as (ccNSO Council): One week for the subgroup, one week for the full group? 00:42:45 David McAuley (Verisign): good idea, Bart 00:45:27 David McAuley (Verisign): sounds right 00:46:37 David McAuley (Verisign): that sounds fine too 00:46:46 Alejandra Reynoso .gt - ccNSO Council: Then send a reminder in January ;) 00:51:59 David McAuley (Verisign): 24th would be better 00:53:23 Kimberly Carlson: January: 17 Full Group, 24 Rules SG, 31 Joint FG/SG (rules) 14:00 UTC. Thank you 00:53:24 David McAuley (Verisign): I have not thought about it yet 00:56:21 David McAuley (Verisign): I think this is good 00:56:28 Stephen Deerhake .as (ccNSO Council): This approach makes sense. 00:56:30 David McAuley (Verisign): the three sources from Bart and Sean 00:58:13 David McAuley (Verisign): Time to think 00:58:20 Stephen Deerhake .as (ccNSO Council): +1 David. 00:59:38 Kimberly Carlson: https://ccnso.icann.org/sites/default/files/field-attached/ccnso-nominations-icann-board-guideline-21may20-en.pdf 01:00:56 Kimberly Carlson: ICANN CoI: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/coi-en#:~:text=Section%201.4.%20ICANN%20will%20encourage%20Supporting%20Organizations%20and%20Advisory%20Committees%20and%20other%20ICANN%2Drelated%20bodies%2C%20as%20appropriate%2C%20to%20consider%20implementing%20the%20principles%20and%20practices%20of%20this%20COI%20Policy%20as%20relevant. 01:01:15 Alejandra Reynoso .gt - ccNSO Council: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/coi-en 01:01:16 Kimberly Carlson: Wow, lets try this: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/governance/coi-en 01:02:17 Stephen Deerhake .as (ccNSO Council): They do do it with the Board. 01:02:41 Kimberly Carlson: Sounds good, thanks Sean 01:05:37 Katrina Sataki: We have introduced changes when there was a need to fix things. 01:06:23 Katrina Sataki: It would be logically to apply the fix to the next election rather than continue a faulty process, wouldn’t it? 01:09:24 Katrina Sataki: But I agree with Sean - there should be no changes once the process has started 01:10:05 Stephen Deerhake .as (ccNSO Council): +1Bart 01:10:34 David McAuley (Verisign): +1 @ Stephen and Bart 01:12:15 David McAuley (Verisign): documented is better, agre with Alejandra 01:19:06 Joke Braeken: 🙂 01:19:52 Svitlana Tkachenko: yes, it's good idea 01:20:32 Kimberly Carlson: Happy Holiday season and a healthy new year. Thank you everyone. 01:20:37 Segun Akano: compliments to you all