09:54:48	 From Kimberly Carlson : Hi Fred, welcome
09:55:02	 From Steve Conte : Greetings
09:55:34	 From Kimberly Carlson : Hi Steve
09:55:42	 From fneves : Hi Kim, Hi Steve!
10:01:02	 From James Gannon : Hey everyone just coming off another call will join in 2 mins
10:02:13	 From James Gannon : Ok here now hi everyone
10:04:17	 From James Gannon : Welcome other Steve
10:05:21	 From Steve Conte : based on the staggered cadence of the meeting, I support 90m calls
10:05:25	 From Kristian Ørmen : I have no problem with 90 min.
10:05:29	 From Kristian Ørmen : Let’s get some work done
10:06:56	 From James Gannon : Thanks for that Amy that matches my understanding/expectation from last week
10:09:38	 From Amy Creamer : The Review Team agreed, in a discussion lead by Peter Koch, that this statement is anethical guideline and not a statement that the Review Member is the authorizedspeaker to speak in the name of their appointing organization.  Each AppointingOrganization has a process for decision making which will be followed if necessary in relation to the IFR
10:09:48	 From Amy Creamer : Is what I added to the meeting notes
10:10:22	 From Amy Creamer : I will repeat it in this weeks meeting notes as well, and reference it on the wiki page for the rules of engagement
10:13:16	 From James Gannon : Operating procedures
10:14:09	 From James Gannon : Sorry thanks Amy for finding the right document
10:15:22	 From James Gannon : Nice work
10:23:54	 From Peter Koch : “PTI and ICANN SMEs” is ambiguous: is that PTI/ICANN staff or people with expertise on PTI/ICANN?
10:25:43	 From Amy Creamer : Yes, James is correct
10:25:47	 From kim.davies : Correct, there are seperate contracts for Names, Numbers and Protocol Parameters
10:25:50	 From Amy Creamer : There are several other contracts for other funcitons
10:26:05	 From kim.davies : https://pti.icann.org/agreements
10:26:38	 From James Gannon : Sorry for that bombshell =)
10:27:54	 From Steve Conte : maybe include “(community and/or staff)”
10:28:04	 From James Gannon : +1
10:28:25	 From James Gannon : Amys wording is good
10:28:58	 From James Gannon : Makes sense
10:33:16	 From James Gannon : Yup on the same page as Peter.
10:33:33	 From Amy Creamer : Does anyone have suggested wording?
10:33:34	 From James Gannon : “Fully covered through review team analysis”
10:34:21	 From Amy Creamer : changed - thanks James
10:34:28	 From James Gannon : Yes exactly Peter
10:39:17	 From James Gannon : “ICANNs stewardship of the IANA functions”
10:42:20	 From James Gannon : Yup its correct
10:43:28	 From James Gannon : For g, I would suggest a review of complaints and escalations to IANA to evaluate if there are any systemic and/or recurring issues.
10:43:37	 From James Gannon : (There are none but that fits)
10:44:03	 From Peter Koch : … and consider input from our respective copmnmunities
10:44:49	 From Unguec Stephen : I agree with James and Peter
10:45:02	 From James Gannon : Sure
10:46:32	 From James Gannon : Yeah my 2c is the webinars are usually low value but happy to go with the group
10:48:21	 From James Gannon : I think we can copy the new text from H into I aswell
10:48:34	 From Tomslin Samme-Nlar : agreed
10:49:11	 From James Gannon : Yup
10:49:17	 From Kristian Ørmen : jep
10:49:23	 From James Gannon : Making your life easier
10:51:19	 From James Gannon : Can we continue to review this offline?
10:51:57	 From Tomslin Samme-Nlar : yes, I think we should
10:52:21	 From James Gannon : Its easy work to do on the google doc
10:53:13	 From Tomslin Samme-Nlar : yes
10:53:33	 From USERA : what is the meaning of review offline?
10:54:23	 From James Gannon : To continue to make suggestions on the wording of the document between this meeting and the next meeting
10:55:41	 From USERA : Understood
10:57:00	 From Kristian Ørmen : Can you briefly explain what IANA basic training would include?
10:57:29	 From Rick Wilhelm (Verisign) : 24th preferable for me
10:57:33	 From Kaili Kan : either time for me is fine.
10:58:30	 From Tomslin Samme-Nlar : 20th is best for me, but if there are more people for 24th, I can watch the recording
10:58:43	 From Kristian Ørmen : Thanks. Being in this review i would definitely listen in either in live or just the recording
10:59:00	 From James Gannon : No preference here I can do either
10:59:25	 From USERA : 24th is better for me
11:00:31	 From Kristian Ørmen : 24th is also better for me
11:01:00	 From James Gannon : Im sure we can survive without Amy having to do 3am authorisations =)
11:01:23	 From Stephen Unguec : I can do either
11:01:44	 From kim.davies : 20th is a public holiday here so I wont be sad if its the 24th
11:01:47	 From Christian Dawson : 24th works
11:02:04	 From James Gannon : 24th it is then
11:02:18	 From James Gannon : Thanks all
11:02:41	 From Tomslin Samme-Nlar : thanks all
11:02:44	 From Kristian Ørmen : Thank you