08:39:16 From Claudia Ruiz : Welcome to the ICANN67 Planning Committee Call
08:59:00 From davekissoondoyal : Hello everybody
08:59:49 From Heidi Ullrich : Hello, everyone.
09:00:53 From Filina Natalia : Hello everyone!
09:01:57 From silvia.vivanco : Hello all
09:06:50 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Not at this stage
09:07:38 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Much better volume Thx
09:12:29 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : It's a good process and I see such a group process of input then development coming from other part of ICANN as well... via lists etc., for then discussion... It is *NOT* IMO an open call for all and sundry
09:14:33 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Ohh dear I had assumed that was an official Brian topic
09:15:14 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : So is APRALO going to arrange it all???
09:15:51 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : I know of now discussion IN APRALO!
09:16:28 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Now THAT's a good question to ask @Maureen
09:17:46 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : I wonder if the Facilitator has been consulted!
09:20:06 From Daniel K. Nanghaka : Incase anything did not go through the process then it should be removed and sent back to the process
09:21:20 From Jonathan Zuck : Seems like it was
09:22:52 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Well then Tanzi needs educating
09:23:30 From Jonathan Zuck : happy to discuss on cpwg
09:23:52 From Jonathan Zuck : for now we pull it?
09:23:58 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : And the MSM will be atopic under Brian's work reporting anyway...
09:24:01 From Joanna Kulesza : just for the record: I feel the topic has a lot of potential and could be amended to reflect AtLarge position and end user interests but only once we make sure due process is followed.
09:24:12 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : as that project continues
09:26:40 From Heidi Ullrich : I’ve written to Jan
09:27:43 From Heidi Ullrich : @Cheryl, agree that the MSM will be covered by a session with Brian
09:28:34 From Gisella Gruber : THANK YOU Yrjo!
09:29:21 From Jonathan Zuck : Yes
09:29:56 From Jonathan Zuck : We can make them required for funded travellers
09:30:11 From Jonathan Zuck : yes!
09:33:33 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Pre Webinars are needed to be better utilised
09:34:00 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : and yes I like the options for bookending some of our key topics
09:34:58 From Jonathan Zuck : sure. Let’s figure that out beforehand
09:35:50 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : 'Attends the Pre Webinars or has to get themselves up to speed on the materials via the recordings
09:35:59 From Heidi Ullrich : In the past, a single issue session allows for good discussion
09:36:04 From Heidi Ullrich : Without disruptions
09:36:34 From Jonathan Zuck : Exactly @Heidi
09:36:49 From Jonathan Zuck : Scared of what we’re doing...
09:37:48 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : @JZ as the programme for AT-Large develops here let's keep a close eye on the 'bookending of critical topics so the follow on by flexible space as you proposed is attended to where possible... that as you say might help a great deal
09:37:58 From Heidi Ullrich : Will there be another ALAC/GAC/NPOC comms session?
09:38:17 From Heidi Ullrich : I believe there will be an intersessional meeting, but it would be useful to have a follow up f2f
09:38:18 From Maureen Hilyard (ALAC) : yes that's another session to be added
09:38:30 From Maureen Hilyard (ALAC) : Communication
09:41:42 From Jonathan Zuck : I’d love a plenary discussion at some point on “Promoting Communities around the World” that could include indigenous rights, applicant support, alternatives to the open registrar model, etc. etc.
09:42:16 From Jonathan Zuck : They protect their markets from new gTLDs! ;)
09:42:19 From Holly Raiche : @ JZ - sounds really interesting
09:42:52 From Heidi Ullrich : Do you mean an ICANN Plenary?
09:43:02 From Heidi Ullrich : Is there time to submit one at this point?
09:43:47 From Maureen Hilyard (ALAC) : Aren't we talking about At-Large Plenary?
09:44:10 From Filina Natalia : Great, interesting @JZ. ICANN Plenary I guess?
09:44:37 From Maureen Hilyard (ALAC) : ICANN Plenaries must be DNS related
09:44:53 From Maureen Hilyard (ALAC) : Community interest suits At-Large
09:45:01 From Holly Raiche : Agree with Maureen - tie it to DNS
09:45:41 From Holly Raiche : t almost ties to the PIR - and cost of domain names????
09:46:44 From Holly Raiche : Also - in Oz, we have a concept to community names for .au
09:48:14 From Joanna Kulesza : bring back the indigenous ambassadors programme?
09:48:30 From Heidi Ullrich : There is time for an ABR on this
09:48:41 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Somewhat more than a concept @Holly we have Geo Community Names
09:48:42 From Heidi Ullrich : Or even something in the flexibility fund
09:49:00 From Jonathan Zuck : what’s an ABR?
09:49:02 From Heidi Ullrich : So, is there an AI here?
09:49:14 From Heidi Ullrich : Additional Budget Request
09:49:39 From Heidi Ullrich : See - At-Large FY21 Budget Development Workspace
09:50:11 From Jonathan Zuck : Oh, right. For research or something? This idea is not every well fleshed out in my head yet
09:50:17 From Holly Raiche : At JZ - one example is in Oz - a special category of names with reservation for each community for each post code. It isn’t widely used - but maybe relevant
09:50:38 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : That sounds excellent @Joanna
09:50:38 From Jonathan Zuck : Yes.
09:50:47 From Heidi Ullrich : @Maureen/Joanna/Jonathan - is this an At-Large session?
09:51:00 From Jonathan Zuck : We could just add a question mark for Joanna’s thing “one world one internet?”
09:51:02 From Heidi Ullrich : Plenary was a term we used for ATLAS or the ICANN HITs
09:52:01 From Joanna Kulesza : +1 Jonathan
09:52:52 From Joanna Kulesza : I liked the idea of this being an HIT session but the difference between a HIT session and a plenary beats me.
09:54:17 From Jonathan Zuck : No difference Joanna
09:54:50 From Jonathan Zuck : since we’re pulling one of the plenaries, there’s room for something…
09:56:05 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Plenary as defined is to be attended by all participants at a conference or assembly, who otherwise meet in smaller groups.
09:56:21 From Heidi Ullrich : Perhaps you could start in Cancun as At-Large and then if it is successful and needs follow up - then an ICANN Plenary in KL
09:57:23 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : That does not as @Joanna is stating exclude an At-Large Cap Bld effort IN our Group
09:57:40 From Joanna Kulesza : +1 Cheryl
09:57:46 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : and that itself may or may not need to be AT a F2F meeting
09:57:46 From Heidi Ullrich : We could benefit from Lilian’s connection in the indigenous area in Latin America
09:57:49 From Joanna Kulesza : I see those as complementary
09:58:37 From Heidi Ullrich : And then expand the discussion in KL - Australian/Pacific indiginous
09:59:20 From Jonathan Zuck : We certainly COULD put either of these sessions together as proposal and organize it
09:59:42 From silvia.vivanco : Great idea Heidi
10:00:06 From Heidi Ullrich : At-Large has had roundtables in the past that have been very popular
10:00:10 From Holly Raiche : Love the thought
10:00:20 From Heidi Ullrich : So this could be in an open roundtable sponsored by ALAC
10:00:37 From Joanna Kulesza : Thank you
10:00:40 From Holly Raiche : Agree- I used to organize them and they were popular beyond just ALAC
10:00:49 From Heidi Ullrich : Yep, Holly!
10:00:53 From Heidi Ullrich : Very popular!
10:01:12 From Holly Raiche : So here I go again!
10:01:18 From Joanna Kulesza : I will work on a draft agenda and send it your way asap. happy to adapt it to your suggestions on how to best table this idea in Cancun.
10:01:27 From Heidi Ullrich : You brought speakers in from across the community which brought people from their groups
10:01:34 From Heidi Ullrich : Break those silos :)
10:01:42 From Holly Raiche : @ Heidi - which was part of the point
10:01:46 From Heidi Ullrich : :)
10:01:48 From Jonathan Zuck : Atlarge.wiki/icann67
10:01:57 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Breaking silos works for me
10:02:01 From Heidi Ullrich : To confirm, Joanna’s session will be an At-large session.
10:02:09 From Jonathan Zuck : sounds like it
10:02:21 From DANIEL K. NANGHAKA : breaking silos is great
10:03:06 From Cheryl Langdon-Orr : Let then know it is *NOT* through proper channels
10:06:15 From davekissoondoyal : ok thanks and bye to all
10:07:07 From DANIEL K. NANGHAKA : thank you all
10:07:17 From DANIEL K. NANGHAKA : bye
10:07:26 From silvia.vivanco : Thank you all ! :) Bye
10:07:32 From Filina Natalia : thank you alll bye bye

  • No labels