AT-LARGE GATEWAY

At-Large Website

ALAC

RALOs

At-Large Regional Policy Engagement Program (ARPEP)

At-Large Governance

At-Large Reports

Policy Comments & Advice

Working Groups

ICANN Meetings

At-Large Summit (ATLAS III)

At-Large Review Implementation Plan Development

ALAC and RALO Elections, Selections, and Appointments

At-Large Priority Activities - 2021

 

 

Independent Examiner’s Final Recommendation

ALAC Rules of Procedure should be updated with the addition of new procedure regarding the use of random selection for the appointment of key At-Large leadership positions.

Issue Identified


Does ALAC Support Recommendation?

Reject

If Not, Please Provide Reasoning.

Although random selection may be used as a last resort among clearly qualified and acceptable people at times, it is a poor mechanism with which to make the vast majority of leaders. Reference to IETF misunderstands how the IETF uses random selection (for its NomCom, not leadership positions, and even then candidates must meet a stronger criteria than just volunteering).

If ALAC Does Not Support Recommendation, Does It Suggest an Alternative Recommendation?

If so, please provide a suggested alternative Recommendation.


Prioritization


At-Large Comments


Possible Dependencies


Who Will Implement?


Resource  Requirements


Budget Effects impact?


Implementation Timeline


Proposed Implementation Steps




  • No labels

3 Comments

  1. Alan Greenberg

    My thoughts

    Status:Reject

    Comment: Although random selection may be used as a last resort among clearly qualified and acceptable people at times, it is a poor mechanism with which to make the vast majority of leaders. Reference to IETF misunderstands how the IETF uses random selection (for its NomCom, not leadership positions, and even then candidates must meet a stronger criteria than just volunteering)

  2. Glenn McKnight

    Status  Reject


    Comment

    It just doesn't make sense

  3. Vanda Scartezini

    agree with GLENN - doesn't make sense at all